Pro-War Article

[g3ddy_lee]

I deicided to write an article yesterday building upon the ebaumsworld.com webmaster's update regarding the war and protestors. I'd like all of you guys to read it, mainly you people who share my pro-war opinions, and please reply and tell me what you think :) :) :) :)

http://www.run-around.com
[site is still under development]

Under 'Political Rants', goto 'U.S. At War'.

Thanks in advance folks.

-Geddy Lee

[Truerussian558]

saddam husein is NOT a comunist next time research you oppinions a bit more before writing them

and this line You detect a hazardous people, identify them, and eliminate them. there are about 4 or 5 other countries with "evil" dictators all of them doing the same things suddam is torturing people enslaving political opponents, except those other countries don't have OIL so the u.s. doesn't care

[g3ddy_lee]

Yes, I do realize now that I referred to SH as a communist, I honestly don't know why I put that, maybe I was thinking of Castro for some reason. Although you don't agree with me on this topic, I thank you for pointing this out.

And by the way, next time YOU write to ME, try to make sure you spell so that the average English speaking human can understand it.
:eek:

Anyway, it's not all about oil. There is so much terrorist activity ongoing in Iraq, yet somehow they don't manage to have nuclear capabilities. We must put our foot down now and eliminate them before they have these weapons of destruction. How do you, Mr. Truerussian, believe would be an effective measure of disarming terrorists?



AND WHAT IS THIS? You think the U.S. should be helping other countries too? Why would we risk our asses trying to save other countries? The only reason we care about Sadaam is because he threatens us with biological, and soon, nuclear weapons. End of Story.

-Geddy

[Sas]

We should just turn the desert into glass over there... I say drop a few dozen nukes and let Saddam try to hide from that...

[Unregistered]

Originally posted by Sas
We should just turn the desert into glass over there... I say drop a few dozen nukes and let Saddam try to hide from that...

There is no reason to stoop to Saddam's level and kill millions of civilians with weapons of mass destruction. Don't get me wrong here, I'm about as pro-war as it gets; however, at this point the U.S. has no motive to wipe out an entire city just to kill Saddam. If Saddam unleashes his arsenal of chemical and bio weapons on our troops, then I may support your opinion.

[Sas]

If we nuked everything over there though, he wouldn't have a chance to use bio/chem weapons against us...

[g3ddy_lee]

Sas-while the idea of nuking a country in the middle east may sound like a good idea when you picture the casualties, they're not necessary. First of all, just about every country hates us already for invading Iraq. Secondly, if we were to nuke Iraq, we would completely poison the environment, and frankly, that's just not a good thing.

In my opinion nukes were created for power, but when in the hands of terrorists, it could mean potention death to all of us. Nuking would only be used as a last resort.

-Geddy

[deagler]

sas, please tell me that is a joke

[MrMix]

If he had been assassinated in 1939, we would have saved about 80 million innocent lives. But NO. Due to the irresponsibilities of German citizens, a massive world war broke out, with casualties in the millions, not to mention the Holocaust.

that's too much,even with the holocaust

[g3ddy_lee]

How's 52,199,262 casualties sound? ;]

-Geddy

[chris_78660]

g3ddy,
the holocaust was damn near 60 years ago...i do not think contemporary germans could possibly still hold responcibilty...

If he had been assassinated in 1939, we would have saved about 80 million innocent lives. But NO. Due to the irresponsibilities of German citizens, a massive world war broke out, with casualties in the millions, not to mention the Holocaust.
let me remind you that the people of germany were living in poverty and this new ferocious speaking dictator was pulling them out of the slums....they saw a way out and they led him the way...you cannot hold the entire german population for not killing a man who turned their country into a powerful force in a matter of years. he was a genius for his time.
by the time the germans realized what hitlers agenda truely was, it was far too late to stop him...thats where we came in.

[Unregistered]

I couldn't have said it better! I think these un-informed anti-war people should look at the torture and oppression of that country. I am embarassed by their actions! I really wish that they could have lived over there pre-war to really understand what is happening. I guess these are the same people that would want to negotiate with him or his son's when they have full nuclear capabilities. Stand up and be AMERICANS and SUPPORT your troops they have fought as always! So that you could voice your opinion!!! If you were in Iraq- then we wouldn't be listening to you would we! What is really a shame is that our police are busy with this B.S. instead of securing the Country!

[g3ddy_lee]

Ok, i did not say that present day Germans were to blame for the Holocaust. I'm simply saying that back in the day, everyone just figured he'd go away after a while, but he never did.

[shade]

Guys on the pro war side, you need to make sure your facts are straight. Even if an anti war nut can tell what your point is, if your numbers are wrong they jump on it. There definately were not 80 million deaths in WW2...

Anyway,

there are about 4 or 5 other countries with "evil" dictators all of them doing the same things suddam is torturing people enslaving political opponents, except those other countries don't have OIL so the u.s. doesn't care

None to the extent as saddam. And none have such direct ties to terrorism or the willingness to distribute their WMD. Get the fuck off the oil bullshit, this isnt about oil. The only oil bush cares about is what we have in Alaska sitting under fucking ICE that clinton arbitrarily declared a nature preserve on his way out because he KNEW there was oil there and it would be an issue where the democrats could pretend to care about the environment and appeal to the environmentalist groups.

DENIED
http://shade.austin2600.org/liberal.jpg

[George Junior]

There have been tons of Dictators as evil as Saddam in the past decade, but the US hasn't done anything about it (Guess what, the states really doesn't care about ending terrorism, they're only interested in keeping the people in panic so that they will support the upper class's selfish goals :eek: ).

I don't see why Americans are so proud of their involvement in WW II anyways. They stayed out of it until Pearl Harbour. They only entered the war when someone attacked them. Is this the humanitarianism that the American population is so proud of?

Also, have you noticed how pro-warrers associate their position with Americanism? How is ending terrorism American? America thrives on terror and panic. Can you believe how insane everybody was with the anthrax scare? 3 people died over a few weeks. Tens of thousands of people die in car crashes every year. Tens of thousands die of shootings every year. America has a history of exaggerating the terrorism threat. The war really is a very American move on America's part, but not because they are trying to end terrorism. The media and government are giving the American people an enemy to hate because there wasn't enough hatred generated by the reaction to the Taliban for 9-11. People still want blood for the twin towers and they haven't gotten it, so the powers-that-be moved from Osama to the next Arab ruler.

Also, there was an embarrasing statement in your rant g3ddy. For the most part, I found it well thought out (I still don't agree though), but in the middle you said that it was a leader's job to find hazardous people and eliminate them. I think I don't need to point out the ridiculousness of that statement.

[g3ddy_lee]

...what the fuck is wrong with that statement? Ok then, let me rephrase to what you believe in that statement:

"A leader's job is to find a problem, find a country, blame the problem on the country."

Better?