9/11 Whistleblower Andrew Grove Comes Forward

[GLOBALIST]

9/11 Whistleblower Andrew Grove Comes Forward
May 29, 2006
Maria Heller Show

[Listen to Andrew] (http://www.911blogger.com/files/audio/MeriaHellerRichardAndrewGrove.mp3)

This man, Richard Andrew Grove, a whistleblower who worked for the big boys and money people behind 9/11 has come out with information to set the 9/11 movement on fire.

Although many have rejected his work (too busy, big egos, whatever) including the IRS, Treasury Dept and SEC, what he exposes on Marsh & McLellan, AIG, Dyncorp, Spitzer, Stewart Air Force Base, Fitzgerald, Bremer, missing gold and bucks of 9/11, software that predicts the future and more will ASTOUND YOU as it did me. I will be having him live on the show in June, but wanted you to hear this urgent information immediately. That is why I worked on it all day.

If you are a journalist, blogger, etc., DO NOT think this is a ruse. I expect you to LISTEN intently to what this man is presenting and act on it.

If you are a friend, subscriber, past guest, listen and then relisten. Pass it on to every outlet and every email list, group you have. This information is EXPLOSIVE. The more of us that know this information, the greater the chances I won't be killed for presenting it, and the greater the chances for a real revolution in America's thinking processes. Go beyond the explosions, destruction of evidence, etc., and learn who BENEFITTED and HOW on 9/11 to find out who the Corporate Fundamentalists are that were behind it all.

Thank you for trusting me with this one, it's well worth it.
Love,
Meria

"We're mad as hell and we're not going to take it anymore".
"THE MERIA HELLER SHOW"[Source..] (http://www.911blogger.com/)

http://www.Meria.net

[Asbestos Crayon]

Software that predicts the future and more will ASTOUND YOU as it did me.

You have to be smoking crack or just reading the tabloids. If you are so ASTOUNDED by a lie, then I'm God. Give me all your money and worship me.

[whocares]

Another 9/11 conspiracy thread. A piece of software is now the best evidence they have...

[TFS]

Man, for being so big on software, they sure butchered their site layout.

[Warmonger]

I cannot belive what some people are able to do for money - ever since I saw WTC 7 go down I knew there was something wrong with the official story of 9/11. We need REAL patriots like Andrew Growe - the government won´t tell us what really happened on 9/11 - because they were behind it all.

[MooCowzRock]

I cannot belive what some people are able to do for money - ever since I saw WTC 7 go down I knew there was something wrong with the official story of 9/11. We need REAL patriots like Andrew Growe - the government won´t tell us what really happened on 9/11 - because they were behind it all.
Too bad the official story is the truth...There is nothing wrong with how WTC 7 went down...espacially when the had one of the largest buildings in the world knock out about 15 of the lower floors...

[GLOBALIST]

Too bad the official story is the truth...There is nothing wrong with how WTC 7 went down...espacially when the had one of the largest buildings in the world knock out about 15 of the lower floors...

Pff, there is plenty wrong with the Official Story, which infact is based on a THEORY itself. The 9/11 Commission Report doesnt even explain how WTC7 collapsed, the best that they can come up with is that the senario for the collapse was "highly unprobable". Even Thomas Kean, the 9/11 Commission Chairman says that WTC7 was not "part of the report". Why cant they explain the collapse? Its because their explaination would cause more questions than answers. . .
And what about the "pancake theory" that the Official Story believers think is the reason why all 3 buildings collapsed. On a NOVA Documentary, Professor Eager explains the "pancake theory" as floors collapsing onto others below, causing a domino-effect. But Eager intentionally leaves out the core columns in his presentation! (http://iwilltryit.com/criminals20008_00018.JPG) Any dolt can find pictures of WTC construction and see that each Tower has STEEL CORE COLUMNS (http://azazel.smugmug.com/photos/71635323-M.jpg) which this bastard liar leaves out, to make it seem like his theory is probable. :rollseyes

[MooCowzRock]

Pff, there is plenty wrong with the Official Story, which infact is based on a THEORY itself. The 9/11 Commission Report doesnt even explain how WTC7 collapsed, the best that they can come up with is that the senario for the collapse was "highly unprobable". Even Thomas Kean, the 9/11 Commission Chairman says that WTC7 was not "part of the report". Why cant they explain the collapse? Its because their explaination would cause more questions than answers. . .
And what about the "pancake theory" that the Official Story believers think is the reason why all 3 buildings collapsed. On a NOVA Documentary, Professor Eager explains the "pancake theory" as floors collapsing onto others below, causing a domino-effect. But Eager intentionally leaves out the core columns in his presentation! (http://iwilltryit.com/criminals20008_00018.JPG) Any dolt can find pictures of WTC construction and see that each Tower has STEEL CORE COLUMNS (http://azazel.smugmug.com/photos/71635323-M.jpg) which this bastard liar leaves out, to make it seem like his theory is probable. :rollseyes

Actually, everyone is waiting for NIST to comes out with its final report on WTC 7, which is supposedly coming out this fall. Go on their site and find a little info on when it comes out, I am sure you'll find it.

[TFS]

Pff, there is plenty wrong with the Official Story, which infact is based on a THEORY itself. The 9/11 Commission Report doesnt even explain how WTC7 collapsed, the best that they can come up with is that the senario for the collapse was "highly unprobable". Even Thomas Kean, the 9/11 Commission Chairman says that WTC7 was not "part of the report". Why cant they explain the collapse? Its because their explaination would cause more questions than answers. . .
And what about the "pancake theory" that the Official Story believers think is the reason why all 3 buildings collapsed. On a NOVA Documentary, Professor Eager explains the "pancake theory" as floors collapsing onto others below, causing a domino-effect. But Eager intentionally leaves out the core columns in his presentation! (http://iwilltryit.com/criminals20008_00018.JPG) Any dolt can find pictures of WTC construction and see that each Tower has STEEL CORE COLUMNS (http://azazel.smugmug.com/photos/71635323-M.jpg) which this bastard liar leaves out, to make it seem like his theory is probable. :rollseyes
Steel beams used were not meant to, nor could they withstand that kind of sudden stop-go slamming impact at that force. The weight was too great and too sudden and not at all meant to be the force that structure was meant to hold. It only takes one floor to lose structural integrity (the towers lost at least 10 each) for the entire structure to come collapsing down on itself. The buildings' only chance was if only maybe the top one or two floors started collapsing instead of the floors closer to the middle.

I live with a civil engineer (bachelor's from Notre Dame, master's from Penn State, 28 years' professional experience), married to another civil engineer (bachelor's from Notre Dame, 26 years professional experience), who lost his brother in 9/11 and even they both say the story checks out.

[CBowling]

They say that it is built to withstand a plane ramming into it at full speeds...but they find different when the actual test comes out.

As was said in an earlier thread, the Titanic was said to be unsinkable...now look.

Now I dont really care who the hell is to blame right at the moment because of this. I know Osama Bin Laden is a terrorist and deserves to be caught, but thats really it.

When I think about 9/11 I like to think about those that died and gave their lives in that incident instead of worrying about who is to blame.

[TORCH]

Another 9/11 conspiracy thread. A piece of software is now the best evidence they have...

Sorry, I completely forgot that its not "Evidence" unless you see it on FOX News.

I believe there is more than enough evidence out there, but people fail to believe it because of the major networks cannot and will not air such information.

Speaking of evidence, a friend of mine found a video clip where Rumsfield slips and says something about the last flight being shot down. If anyone has a link to it, please post it. Otherwise, I'll as my friend where he found it.

[Warmonger]

I belive its this one; Rumsfeld says Flight 93 was "shot down.":

http://youtube.com/watch?v=x6Xoxaf1Al0

Just shows he isn´t always lying - sometimes he tells the truth by mistake...