yanks and brits

[ramittinbawdeep]

just joined on here today and noticed a bit of animosity between a few americans towards britain in general. is there a problem or is it against certain people on here :confused:

[Bugfatty]

We're just having a dispute. There is no animosity towards anybody. Americans see things one way and britts see things another way.

Then you have the Canadians....*shudders*

[BigMattTheHobo]

It isn't against any country in paticular, just certain people in those countries.

[Karly]

i hate all the brits- esp Viceroy ;)

[shade]

is there a problem or is it against certain people on here I only hate certain brits, like Viceroy. Mainly because he pretends he knows something about american politics and the intricacies of them through history, especially about the area I happen to live in.

[dylan-d]

OMGOMGOMG It's a Scottish guy! Get 'em!!! :rolleyes: :D

[Bugfatty]

Scoootlan is Free!!!!!!

[BlueMind]

Haha, I have a scottish guy in my class at school.

In the class we have, the teacher is new and doesn't want to send kids to the office becuase it makes her look bad.

This guy just came from Scotland and has a very thick accent. That and he curses a lot.

One day, he has his head down and the teacher goes "Steven, pick your head up."

Apparently he doesn't like being called Steven, so he stands up and says "who the fock colld me Steven."

After around 30 seconds he looks at the teacher and says "It wos you wosn't't"

You Scottish crack me up.

[Karly]

I only hate certain brits, like Viceroy. Mainly because he pretends he knows something about american politics and the intricacies of them through history, especially about the area I happen to live in.


shade- you dislike viceroy simply because he is as arrogant & stubborn as you are in your views. You 2 are cut with the same scissors. Neither of you budge & both of you think your OPINIONS are the only ones that matter.

Not a flame- just an observation- I am not in any way defending viceroys skewed views, just pointing out ur similarities.

[DeeDee]

The british are far more vulgar than us americans are.. or rather, that is what i have had the pleasure of noticing. Sometimes their open minded views towards sex is sorta a turn on.. and sometimes it just makes me want to run into the bathroom and take a shower.

[j.elohim]

The british are far more vulgar than us americans are.. or rather, that is what i have had the pleasure of noticing. Sometimes their open minded views towards sex is sorta a turn on.. and sometimes it just makes me want to run into the bathroom and take a shower.

LOL!!!!!!!!! No one is more vulgar than the americans. After all you have MTV and i don't know where you got the idea that the british are open minded about anything, most folk still have sex in the dark under the sheets missonary styleeee and never talk about it again. Here's a prime example of how anal britain is....In northern ireland a man may not have anal sex with a woman, EVER but he can with a man at 16. Figure that one out.

[Viceroy]

John Cleese once said "An Englishman would rather be told he is a bad lover than he has no sense of humour."

I love living in a country where a sense of humour is almost vital. The language of irony, sarcasm and cynicism is hilarious when employed well.

In America, a sense of humour/irony is nice, but not essential. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: When God was handing out irony, Americans must have been somewhere else.

In conclusion, Britain is best.

[Merkulrdanu]

americans have a sense of humor. it just that we have a different sense of humor

[Jacksplat]

I love living in a country where a sense of humour is almost vital. Brit Humor is fucking horrible...It is vital because Britain sucks and humor helps ease the pain.

[RaYmOnD]

i hate all the brits- esp Viceroy ;)
Awww, damn. :(

Us English people are nice:

We don't have bad teeth, Facts show ours are better than americans :cool:

We don't have strong posh accents

It doesn't snow.

Just to clear them up.

[Viceroy]

We don't have bad teeth, Facts show ours are better than americans

We get orthodontic treatment on the NHS. :D

[ramittinbawdeep]

we wont be lying in an ER wiv half a leg missing and some stupid prick coming up and asking if we got life/health insurance :p

how do you confuse an american?

show him two shovels and ask him to take his pick :D

sorry its usually an irish man the jokes about :)

[Dozzi]

Originally Stated by Mamichulli
shade- you dislike viceroy simply because he is as arrogant & stubborn as you are in your views. You 2 are cut with the same scissors. Neither of you budge & both of you think your OPINIONS are the only ones that matter.


I disagree with your opinion. :rolleyes:

Shade said he dislikes Vice because Vice pretends to know what life in America is life, while he's living in Britain.

You can not make up Shade based on what you see. There is a difference between being arrogant & stubborn and being factual & opinionated.

[Karly]

I disagree with your opinion. :rolleyes:

Shade said he dislikes Vice because Vice pretends to know what life in America is life, while he's living in Britain.

You can not make up Shade based on what you see. There is a difference between being arrogant & stubborn and being factual & opinionated.


why did I KNOW you were gonna put ur 1 cent into my comment? so predicktable. :rolleyes:

[Dozzi]

I love ya mami. Getting under your skin...

oooooooooh yeah. Just hits me in the right spot :cool:

But I'm serious.

[Karly]

I love ya mami. Getting under your skin...

oooooooooh yeah. Just hits me in the right spot :cool:

But I'm serious.


so am I- I meant what i posted about both shade & viceroy- only thing is that with you , you favor shade because you agree with him. I on the other hand favor neither one of them.
I hate everyone. :)

[Bergs]

Shade and Viceroy are different. Shade is educated and stubborn and because of this he is very opinionated. Viceroy is a moron who pretends to know what he is talking about.

And about the initial topic, nobody here dislikes brits. i dont think anyone has a problem with ray, or eva, or j.elohim but viceroy is just a little fucktard and thats who the hostility is aimed towards.

[Dual]

I have no hate for the British.

[DeeDee]

I really have no hatred for the british either... but they are more vulgar. I have been told there are three places that you can go in the world as a man and get laid as soon as you set foot in the country.. Amsterdam, England, and Germany. I believe that someone made a comment about it's ok to have anal sex in england with 16 year old boys.. ok.. that's not vulgar how????

[krazykomrade]

mamichuli, I 100% agree with everything you have said in this thread. Its almost amusing how similar they can be at times. And I'm Welsh so I gotta hate the damn brits. though i must cede that a british accent can make almost any women sexy, its like a magnifying glass for sexyness. I suppose thats not relevent, but at least its not flame or cons./lib. war.

[Viceroy]

Viceroy is a moron who pretends to know what he is talking about.

You're the dumb fuck who thought we should carpet bomb Falluja if I remember correctly. You'd read some ill-informed article in a New York newspaper about how America was "pussy footing" around and you used their flimsy arguements to launch into a tirade against America's soft handed tactics. Great idea asshole.

You're calling me a moron? The fact that the US military employs people as stupid as you casts a vast shadow of doubt over your entire system.

[shade]

we wont be lying in an ER wiv half a leg missing and some stupid prick coming up and asking if we got life/health insurance Actually no. If you go to an ER you are treated and billing is dealt with later.

though i must cede that a british accent can make almost any women sexy, its like a magnifying glass for sexyness. As long as they shave.

Heck, how could I hate brits? Google "sir john clayton," the first generation of my bloodline in the US. Dont count the fact that they founded virginia and killed brits in the revolutionary war... and canadians too in 1812!!

[wataba]

Brit Humor is fucking horrible...It is vital because Britain sucks and humor helps ease the pain.

hell no! i love britain because they gave us the gift of monty python...ah yes, though it is a rather weird sense of humor
good nonetheless

[Jacksplat]

hell no! i love britain because they gave us the gift of monty python...ah yes, though it is a rather weird sense of humor
good nonetheless
I'm sorry wataba. I totally forgot about Monty Python.!

Were looking for the Holy Grail ! We have one already Go Away !

What is your favorite color? Blue no wait Red ! Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh!

[Stanky105]

i must cede that a british accent can make almost any women sexy, its like a magnifying glass for sexyness.

Actually, I agree that it is a magnifying glass, but as the appearance over all. If she is sexy, the british accent puts her over the top and makes me start drooling... but if it is an ugly girl with a british accent, for the love of god stab her in the face with a living room couch.

[Bergs]

You're the dumb fuck who thought we should carpet bomb Falluja if I remember correctly.

You remember incorrectly. I didnt call for the carpet bombing of anything so quit the slander and post something of substance. How bout starting with this, give me one good reason why we shouldnt be fighting the insurgents in Fallujah more aggressively since you were incapable of doing that in the initial thread. Nobody else answer please, I want to see if Viceroy actually owns a set of balls.

BTW, FLAME FLAME FLAME!

[Viceroy]

You remember incorrectly. I didnt call for the carpet bombing of anything so quit the slander and post something of substance. How bout starting with this, give me one good reason why we shouldnt be fighting the insurgents in Fallujah more aggressively since you were incapable of doing that in the initial thread. Nobody else answer please, I want to see if Viceroy actually owns a set of balls.

When it’s written it's known as libel, not slander. Dumbass.

As for fighting more aggressively in Fallujah, I have no problem with it so long as it's directed surgically at the troublemakers. What I disagree with is the heavy handed tactics which you advocate (ie. Abrams tanks, B-52s). You gonna deny it? How about after you see this:

this editorial in NY Post the other day captured my current opinion so well I had to post this.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/04102004/postopinion/opedcolumnists/18538.htm

If that's your opinion, then quite obviously you advocate carpet boming. I see it says “my current opinion”. Does that mean you’ve had a change of heart? Either way, that article states that America should level whole Iraqi neighbourhoods if it means saving American soldiers lives. As extra proof you conceded:

an American life is worth more to me than a hundred Iraqis

Great, that's the way to go about gaining the Iraqis trust and winning the peace.

Finally, a fitting quote to end with:


I dont give a rats ass about winning the peace


Congratulations Bergs, you’re a moron. :D

[Stanky105]

I don't see what is wrong with using Abrams, or at least Bradleys/other armored vehicles over those damn humvees. Abrams have other guns on them, its not like you have to use the main cannon to take out every sniper etc.

Often it seems the humvees offer little more protection than the personal armor they (the soldiers) are wearing.

[Bergs]

HAHAHAHA, if the thread is so damning why dont you just link it instead of quoting single lines? Perhaps because it isnt?

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/forum/showthread.php?t=13375&page=1

If that's your opinion, then quite obviously you advocate carpet boming.

:rolleyes: I dont agree with LEVELING Iraqi neighborhoods as the writer said but that is probably the one thing I disagree with him on. No shit is there a civilian factor. I am not advocating killing civilians, I am advocating taking a more aggresive stance in these cities and dealing with the insurgents more intelligently. Is a tank or bradley going to be destroyed by some slapped together roadside bomb that would obliterate a HUMVEE and its passengers? Absolutely not.I dont give a rats ass about winning the peace, I care about my fellow soldiers. I have friends graduating in a month that will be over there as early as the end of the year if we dont start fucking this shit up. I dont want to see anything happen to them. And calling a ceasefire while being shot at will only help to embolden the guerilla's and terrorists who will think that if they cause enough damage we wont want to deal with them anymore. Since I am an American and a soldier, uh yeah. An American life is worth more to me than a hundred Iraqis. Why is that a hard concept to grasp? I dont give a rats ass about people that hate us. Big surprise! Very typical of your type, pick select quotes that make someone look bad and ignore counter evidence. It just shows how much of a retard you truly are.

Now, I am still waiting for my one good reason why we shouldnt be fighting the insurgents in Fallujah more aggressively.

[Viceroy]

I dont agree with LEVELING Iraqi neighborhoods as the writer said but that is probably the one thing I disagree with him on.

Great, so you don’t agree with that. No surprise seeing as I picked it out as the most disgraceful part of that article. There are plenty others that are just as bad, and I would quote them if that article hadn’t disappeared into their archives.

No shit is there a civilian factor. I am not advocating killing civilians, I am advocating taking a more aggresive stance in these cities and dealing with the insurgents more intelligently. Is a tank or bradley going to be destroyed by some slapped together roadside bomb that would obliterate a HUMVEE and its passengers? Absolutely not.

You may not want to kill civilians, but by advocating an aggressive stance, such as sending in tanks you must realize civilians will get killed. It’s known as oblique intent.

I dont give a rats ass about winning the peace, I care about my fellow soldiers. I have friends graduating in a month that will be over there as early as the end of the year if we dont start fucking this shit up. I dont want to see anything happen to them. And calling a ceasefire while being shot at will only help to embolden the guerilla's and terrorists who will think that if they cause enough damage we wont want to deal with them anymore.

If you don’t care about the peace, then why do you care about going over there at all? That is, after all, the purpose now.

Since I am an American and a soldier, uh yeah. An American life is worth more to me than a hundred Iraqis. Why is that a hard concept to grasp? I dont give a rats ass about people that hate us. Big surprise!

An American soldier knows when he joins up that he may die. Your average Iraqi citizen does not willingly take such a risk. Hence, even one civilian death is worse than a soldier dying.

Very typical of your type, pick select quotes that make someone look bad and ignore counter evidence. It just shows how much of a retard you truly are.

Just shows that you shouldn’t say such extreme, dumbass shit if you don’t want it coming back biting you in the ass.

Now, I am still waiting for my one good reason why we shouldnt be fighting the insurgents in Fallujah more aggressively.

I’ve already said what I think, in my previous post.

[Stanky105]

You may not want to kill civilians, but by advocating an aggressive stance, such as sending in tanks you must realize civilians will get killed. It’s known as oblique intent.

I still don't see why you are against the tanks. Just because tanks go in doesn't mean they will start blasting buildings with their main cannons. They have other guns on top of them just like Humvees, the difference is, a tank won't get ripped apart and flipped over by an RPG. It is just to offer more protection to the troops.

[Viceroy]

I still don't see why you are against the tanks. Just because tanks go in doesn't mean they will start blasting buildings with their main cannons. They have other guns on top of them just like Humvees, the difference is, a tank won't get ripped apart and flipped over by an RPG. It is just to offer more protection to the troops.

Is there no such thing as an armoured personnel carrier? If all they wanted was to move troops around safely they would use an APC. A tank can carry what, 10 men max? An APC is far more efficient if all you want is to transport troops safely.

[Stanky105]

Is there no such thing as an armoured personnel carrier? If all they wanted was to move troops around safely they would use an APC. A tank can carry what, 10 men max? An APC is far more efficient if all you want is to transport troops safely.

This is true, but they also don't seem to like to use those. As it stands, they have a LOT to choose from that offer more protection than humvees, but don't like to use them, and I really don't see why.

You also have to also consider that a tank is more threatening than other vehicles. I am sure that the fighters would much rather attack a humvee than a tank.

[Viceroy]

You also have to also consider that a tank is more threatening than other vehicles. I am sure that the fighters would much rather attack a humvee than a tank.

I agree. But my point was if all America wants is to keep it's troops safe, then there are other ways of going about it besides sending in a tank. The only reason a tank would be sent in is to shoot at stuff. Now, speaking from a historical point of view, such tactics don't tend to keep civilians safe and sound.

[Bergs]

If you don’t care about the peace, then why do you care about going over there at all?

To get rid of Saddam's WMDs!!!!! Again you demonstrate your inability to read or think critically. I want to get out of Iraq with the best possible situation for America. We are there on a mistake, I dont deny that, now the best way to fix that mistake is to eliminate the enemy in that country by any means necessary.

You may not want to kill civilians, but by advocating an aggressive stance, such as sending in tanks you must realize civilians will get killed.

And? Thats preferable to American soldiers some of which are my friends getting killed.

An American soldier knows when he joins up that he may die. Your average Iraqi citizen does not willingly take such a risk. Hence, even one civilian death is worse than a soldier dying.

You a sick twisted little shit. So its ok for your friend who happens to be a British soldier to die as long as the poor Iraqi that hates you anyway and would like to kill you isnt harmed? No? I didnt think so. How about your IRA rant in the other thread? Is the death of a British soldier or a Catholic civilian in Belfast more acceptable to you? Truth is you are a lying fucking hypocrite.

Just shows that you shouldn’t say such extreme, dumbass shit if you don’t want it coming back biting you in the ass.

There was no extreme dumbass shit if read completely and kept in context. You picked small lines and took it out of context. Its quite pathetic.

I’ve already said what I think, in my previous post.

You must have done it stealthily, because I didnt see it.

[Viceroy]

I want to get out of Iraq with the best possible situation for America. We are there on a mistake, I dont deny that, now the best way to fix that mistake is to eliminate the enemy in that country by any means necessary.

The best possible solution for America is to leave the country in a much better state than it is now. That means winning the peace, which is what I originally said.

You a sick twisted little shit. So its ok for your friend who happens to be a British soldier to die as long as the poor Iraqi that hates you anyway and would like to kill you isnt harmed? No? I didnt think so. How about your IRA rant in the other thread? Is the death of a British soldier or a Catholic civilian in Belfast more acceptable to you? Truth is you are a lying fucking hypocrite.

A British soldier’s death is terrible. I don’t dispute that any death is awful. But again, a soldier knows he may be called up to fight when he signs up. A civilian does not take such a risk. That is my point. Whether that civilian hates me or not is irrelevant. Just so you don’t make any assumptions, when I talk about civilians I refer to people who have never been set off any bombs, shot at our soldiers etc. In short, innocent civilians.

You must have done it stealthily, because I didnt see it.

You must be half blind then. But nevermind, I’ll re-write it. I guess I have to be more explicit with you in future:

I have no problem with heavy handed tactics so long as it's directed surgically at the troublemakers.

[Bergs]

Maybe you can point out where that is, cause you never wrote it.

Now answer the fucking question about the IRA and the SAS which you defended. Is it better for an SAS trooper to die or some Catholic in Belfast who happens to live near a IRA safehouse? How about if 10 IRA guys are killed and one civilian due to some tactic designed to keep the soldiers safe? Is it acceptable or should the soldiers have rushed in and killed them instead and risked their lives more directly?

The best possible solution for America is to leave the country in a much better state than it is now. That means winning the peace, which is what I originally said.

You cant win the fucking peace when you have insurgents killing your soldiers you dumbfuck!

[Viceroy]

Maybe you can point out where that is, cause you never wrote it.

Message number 32 of this thread.


Now answer the fucking question about the IRA and the SAS which you defended. Is it better for an SAS trooper to die or some Catholic in Belfast who happens to live near a IRA safehouse? How about if 10 IRA guys are killed and one civilian due to some tactic designed to keep the soldiers safe? Is it acceptable or should the soldiers have rushed in and killed them instead and risked their lives more directly?

Don't you bark orders at me you little bitch. I don't know what's keeping me here, but it sure as hell ain't your colourful personality. Anyway, I'll say it's worse that a civilian die, than a member of the SAS. As for 10 IRA agents and one civilian, I would say that's just as bad.

Perhaps you should have talked of the army as being that clumsy though. You don't maintain yourself as being the best special forces in the world by making cock ups like you just described.

You cant win the fucking peace when you have insurgents killing your soldiers you dumbfuck!

Can't win with an Abrams tank either.

[Bergs]

Can't win with an Abrams tank either.

If all the insurgents are dead, whose going to fight you?

[j.elohim]

Is it better for an SAS trooper to die or some Catholic in Belfast who happens to live near a IRA safehouse? How about if 10 IRA guys are killed and one civilian due to some tactic designed to keep the soldiers safe? Is it acceptable or should the soldiers have rushed in and killed them instead and risked their lives more directly?





Sunday, Bloody Sunday

[Viceroy]

Sunday, Bloody Sunday

Demonstration

Soldiers, nervous soldiers.

[ramittinbawdeep]

nervous soldiers being fired upon by unseen gunmen, terrible day in british history, but these things unfortunately happen, goes to show people what happens wen u use the bomb instead of the ballot box. and viceroy as for the sending in of tanks think the point berg was making was that if there was an iraqi with a rpg he'd think again about using it if an abrahms came round the corner instead of a humvee, so mit might be better if u read and understood the posts before u reply :p

[JustinJJ]

In the forums there seems to be a whole lot of America vs. Europe threads. It's not that everyone hates each other, it's more like someone says a small comment in a thread, then someone says another comment, and another and another... it's like rolling a snow ball down a hill... the next thing u know people are running away from a 5 ton snow boulder traveling at 100 mph...

wow... looks like this thread is now at the 10 ton 1000 mph snow boulder level....

[Bergs]

As I said before I have no problem with Europe except for France and I have no hostility towards any European members of this forum but Viceroy is just a clueless ass. I disagree with many of the European members on various things but nobody else is such a douche.

[droogsteve]

nervous soldiers being fired upon by unseen gunmen, terrible day in british history,No it was a typical day in British history. It was a terrible day in Irish history. And not even Viceroy buys that unseen gunmen bullshit, which shows that at least HE'S not completely brainwashed.

Go suck Ian Paisley's cock.

[j.elohim]

nervous soldiers being fired upon by unseen gunmen, terrible day in british history

Everyone knows that is bollox, the para's opened fire from a derelict building into the crowd...None of the eyewitness accounts saw any gun or bomb being used by those who had been shot dead or wounded. No soldiers were injured in the operation, no guns or bombs were recovered at the scene of the killing.

"The real battle just begun
To claim the victory Jesus won
On...

Sunday Bloody Sunday
Sunday Bloody Sunday..."

[ramittinbawdeep]

then the priest at the saville inquiry was lying when he said hed seen armed civiolians on the strret that day, or was it undercover british agents acting as ira gunmen to give the army the legallity to open fire, of course they are not going to find ira guns on the street do you think that wen you are out of ammo you drop the gun and run. in those days the only guns the ira had were those left from the 1950's border campaign, ie not many.they werent daft, in an area like the bogside there are thousands of hidding areas and safe houses that the army/ruc would have needed to search, in effect shut down nearly the entire bogside and surrounding areas. logistically impossible, so it is entirely feasible that the ira shot at the army, melted away and the army went daft and shot at wot they believe were genuine targets, hindsight is a great thing isn't it wonder wot we would have done in their shoes?

[j.elohim]

wonder wot we would have done in their shoes?

I would have packed my shit up and ended the occupation of northen ireland and give the stolen counties back to the irish

[ramittinbawdeep]

if you are willing to talk about bloody sunday would you like to discuss the merits in killing 11 civilians at enniskillin 8 in shankhill road 18 in birmingham pub bombs, 6 civilians at harrods 30 including an unborn baby in omagh,since according to droogsteve in earlier posts on other threads these must have all been legitimate targets to get rid off the brits. or is it just for brit bashing

[j.elohim]

if you are willing to talk about bloody sunday would you like to discuss the merits in killing 11 civilians at enniskillin 8 in shankhill road 18 in birmingham pub bombs, 6 civilians at harrods 30 including an unborn baby in omagh,since according to droogsteve in earlier posts on other threads these must have all been legitimate targets to get rid off the brits. or is it just for brit bashing


I'll talk about anything you like but i'm not an expert on the IRA nor do i condone terrorism, but i do believe in the right of the irish to people to once again reclaim all the land that is rightfully theirs from us.

[ramittinbawdeep]

I'll talk about anything you like

okay then, wots the weather been like down your way? bit of a change of subject

[droogsteve]

Hahahaha!! Are you going to claim that j.elohim is a brainwashed IRA supporter like I am?

It's great to see someone with enough of an open mind to look at the facts and enough integrity to tell the truth, even if it's about their own government.

And as I've said before, I don't hate Britain. They're the best ally that we Americans have. I DO hate what the British government has done to Ireland, but I don't hold ordinary British citizens responsible, nor do I hate them. Can you grasp that concept? Just like I hate Bush and what he's done in Iraq, but I love America.

[j.elohim]

okay then, wots the weather been like down your way? bit of a change of subject


IS that a serious question??? It always rains in manchester...


It's great to see someone with enough of an open mind to look at the facts and enough integrity to tell the truth, even if it's about their own government. :o

[krazykomrade]

Everyone knows that is bollox
What the fuck is bollox?

[j.elohim]

What the fuck is bollox?


Bollocks, like "bollocks to you and your brother", "ouch my bollocks" etc

[Viceroy]

What the fuck is bollox?

Bollocks can mean testicles. But in this sense it refers to nonsense.

[Nocturnal]

just joined on here today and noticed a bit of animosity between a few americans towards britain in general. is there a problem or is it against certain people on here :confused:


generally the British are liked (in the US) more than any other country (maybe tied with candada). We have a similar culture, and generally where one goes the other will follow.

[rangers1690]

And I'm Welsh so I gotta hate the damn brits.

Jesus Christ. KNOCK FUCKING KNOCK. Wales is in Britain you fucking idiot. Its right what people say, bloody Welsh are stupid.

As one nobel Welshman once said: Whos coats this jacket?

[ramittinbawdeep]

wonder wot team u support eh lol
god we were pish this year werent we? :(

[Delta]

god we were pish this year werent we? Talk about two peoples separated by a common language. :D

[ramittinbawdeep]

its called accent related writing, you say somethings piss i say pish
you say tomayto i say tomato, nearly burst in to song there :)

think thats bad wot about
tis a braw moon licht nicht thi nicht :eek:
or furryboots yah fae kenlike mucker? :eek:

want to translate that?

aqnd we thought i was the americans,canadians and austalians who were killing the english language :D

[j.elohim]

think thats bad wot about
tis a braw moon licht nicht thi nicht :eek:
or furryboots yah fae kenlike mucker? :eek:

want to translate that?
:D

Whit you aw aboot? Fuck i haven't been to glasgow in a long while...well there is the "where are you from" part eeeh fuck it i'm too english these days to remember any of this stuff.

[ramittinbawdeep]

think thats bad wot about
tis a braw moon licht nicht thi nicht =
ITSA NICE MOONLIT NIGHT TONIGHT


furryboots yah fae kenlike mucker?=
FROM WHEREABOUT ARE YOU FROM MY FRIEND
want to translate that?