PDA

View Full Version : the law is an ass


ramittinbawdeep
05-04-2004, 08:03 PM
dont know how the law in whatever country your from works regarding this.

the law regarding rape cases is a complete joke. im not talking sentancing or that but the naming of the person charged with it.this person could be totally innocent but will have their name and photo in the paper or on tv. this is way wrong as he will be ever associated with a rape, also wen a women cries rape she has anonimity even if the case is dismissed.... and in 90% of made up claims of rape the womans right to anonimity is upheld even though she is guilty of making up an horrific accusation that wiil destroy a man life. both the accused and the accuser should remain anonymous until the outcome of the trial,that way if the person is innocent they have the chance of a normal life again

Karly
05-04-2004, 08:29 PM
hmmm? are you saying women are given more from the law, & that its unfair to men?

seaweed
05-04-2004, 08:57 PM
Those of you that read news in Asia would know, but there was a case 2-3 months ago where a lady accused an old man for theft and called for help near an ATM. The 60 year old man got held down by a nearby security guard and several other passerbys and by the time the old man was released, the poor old man died from heart failure due from having his heart pressured when being held down. The lady who called accused the old man for theft has not been found, and she apparently was trying to take money out of the old man's account while he was being held.

It's so easy for women to get away with things these days......

I'd wish to keep my background somewhat private so I wont give description on where this occurred.

321 gizzo
05-04-2004, 09:07 PM
cops wanna treat women better than men so they can get a blowjob

JustinJJ
05-05-2004, 06:13 PM
It's not the courts fault, it's the damn media. The media is pretty much the controler of peoples minds and it can and DOES wreck peoples lives.

ramittinbawdeep
05-05-2004, 06:19 PM
i think the media should take a stand and not name people who are ACCUSED of rape. at least wait until the person has been found guilty (if that is the case) before printing his name/photo. as well as campaigning for the naming and shaming of women who falsely accuse men of rape. it is just not fair, men accused and cleared of rape will never be able to live normal lives unless they move hundreds of miles away and that is not fair as the accusations will always linger

Delta
05-05-2004, 06:23 PM
hmmm? are you saying women are given more from the law, & that its unfair to men? I would say that that is a fair assumption. When it comes to crimes or things where it is a man against a woman, the court seems to always think that the woman is right unless proven wrong. Rape casses are one good example. Sexual harrasement is as well. Men have been deamonized over the last couple of decades.

Why oh why did we have to give you women the right to vote?.............. :p

fubar
05-05-2004, 07:13 PM
.
Why oh why did we have to give you women the right to vote?.............. :p

so we could get blowjobs.

Karly
05-05-2004, 08:14 PM
this ramitten dweeb sounds too much like keith lockhart- esp a thread about women? :rolleyes:

Bugfatty
05-05-2004, 08:28 PM
No body make any post critizing women or you will be labled "Keith."

Karly
05-05-2004, 08:30 PM
No body make any post critizing women or you will be labled "Keith."


now ur getting it

RFAlias
05-05-2004, 10:07 PM
Why is it every thread about women gets bashed on all the time, by women.
Is it not a legit thing to debate about? I think it is.
Women do have more rights than men. Just like Minorities have more rights than white people. What happend to everyone is equal?

Uh oh, im the keith guy now :rolleyes: Never stand up for your self, against women.

Nocturnal
05-05-2004, 10:52 PM
Why is it every thread about women gets bashed on all the time, by women.
Is it not a legit thing to debate about? I think it is.
Women do have more rights than men. Just like Minorities have more rights than white people. What happend to everyone is equal?

Uh oh, im the keith guy now :rolleyes: Never stand up for your self, against women.


the problem is that most that make these types of threads resort to racial or sexist remarks and do not add anything to the conversation. Then anyone making a legitamite point is seen as sexist, racist, etc.

BigMattTheHobo
05-05-2004, 10:54 PM
I didn't know I had more rights then you crackers, cool.


:rolleyes:

RFAlias
05-05-2004, 10:59 PM
Yes, that is true, but everyone who talks about it should not be classes as sexist/racist. Thats just stupid, and unfair to the people who are not trying to be like that. Its funny, people that claim to be open minded, really arent.
But on topic, Names should not be disclosed until the final verdict is decided.

In the event that the alledged rapeist is not guilty, his name should not be disclosed, but that of the person who wrongfully accused of someone.
Whoever is at fault, their name should be released so their reputation is tarnished, because people who do that, either rape, or accusing someone of something they didnt do, deserve to be outcasts.

RFAlias
05-05-2004, 11:05 PM
I didn't know I had more rights then you crackers, cool.


:rolleyes:

I dont know your ethnic background, but in most cases, it is true.
Why isn't there like a thousand scholarships for white males? There was very very few, and of thoes, i didnt qualify still because of my parents financial status. But in the process, i noticed loads of them for minorities, just because someone is black or hispanic dosent mean they lack the same ablities as a white person, Oo, but the black family's great great great grand parents were slaves... but how does that effect the descendant? Oh, you are right, it dosent.
What im getting at is weather you want to see it or not, Minorities get more benifits than just the regular white guy.

Sketcher
05-06-2004, 12:31 AM
I dont know your ethnic background, but in most cases, it is true.
Why isn't there like a thousand scholarships for white males? There was very very few, and of thoes, i didnt qualify still because of my parents financial status. But in the process, i noticed loads of them for minorities, just because someone is black or hispanic dosent mean they lack the same ablities as a white person, Oo, but the black family's great great great grand parents were slaves... but how does that effect the descendant? Oh, you are right, it dosent.

Your right. I even saw scholarships for left handed people (again, minority). This is definately a case of minorities getting an advantage over the majority just because of who they are and for no other reason. Same with affermative action. I thought in this country everyone was equal. Guess not.

RFAlias
05-06-2004, 04:39 PM
Wow, someone who agrees.

I have to say, Affermative action, should be renamed to affermative blacktion.
I am in no way racist, but they have really gotten out of hand with some of the stuff that they do.

ramittinbawdeep
05-06-2004, 05:38 PM
this ramitten dweeb sounds too much like keith lockhart- esp a thread about women? :rolleyes:

so are you all for the naming of a rape suspect even if he turns out innocent,ruining quite possibly his marraige, employment or his entire family. i always thought that people were innocent until proven guilty, so why shouldnt the accused be given the same right to anonimity as the victim, if hes guilty fair enough, name him but why should an innocent person be made to suffer all because of some stupid bitch who had a one night stand,regretted it the next day and cries rape all because she,was married or engaged and her fella finds out.

does that make me a dweeb as you call it? no it makes me some one who would like to see a fairer system of handling rape and other sex crimes because of the stigma related to being accused of one. not that i have any personal experience of such matters

or are you one of these dungaree wearing,, "men are all pigs" shouting, think i'll stick to my 9"strap on kind of females who doesnt know when things like the above are wrong? :rolleyes:

RFAlias
05-06-2004, 06:10 PM
so are you all for the naming of a rape suspect even if he turns out innocent,ruining quite possibly his marraige, employment or his entire family. i always thought that people were innocent until proven guilty, so why shouldnt the accused be given the same right to anonimity as the victim, if hes guilty fair enough, name him but why should an innocent person be made to suffer all because of some stupid bitch who had a one night stand,regretted it the next day and cries rape all because she,was married or engaged and her fella finds out.

does that make me a dweeb as you call it? no it makes me some one who would like to see a fairer system of handling rape and other sex crimes because of the stigma related to being accused of one. not that i have any personal experience of such matters

or are you one of these dungaree wearing,, "men are all pigs" shouting, think i'll stick to my 9"strap on kind of females who doesnt know when things like the above are wrong? :rolleyes:


I have to say i agree with you, although in saying that, we both will end up being banned. Oh well.

Yeti Patrol
05-06-2004, 06:24 PM
I myself think rapist are sick bastards, but destroying someones life over an accusation is complete bullshit. The law is seriously fucked up and just because someone is a minoritie they hold more power over the big bad evil cracker for enslaving his great great great grand father :rolleyes: I also wonder if a man has been raped by a women :confused:

ramittinbawdeep
05-06-2004, 06:27 PM
yes they have read it online. a woman got a man home and her 3 pals grabbed him stripped him handcuffed him made him take viagra and then proceeded to have their wicked way with him and the guy went and made a complaint to the cops, pretty sure it was in switzerland

321 gizzo
05-06-2004, 09:32 PM
wanna know another advantageous minority? the gandhi minority. they take up all the jobs at wal-mart.

Karly
05-06-2004, 09:50 PM
wanna know another advantageous minority? the gandhi minority. they take up all the jobs at wal-mart.


no the ppl at walmart are just societal rejects & retards. I also refer to it as white trash central.

RFAlias
05-07-2004, 02:01 AM
Mami, why not reply to any of my, or others posts? Because you have no logical argument?

droogsteve
05-07-2004, 08:14 AM
I have to say i agree with you, although in saying that, we both will end up being banned. Oh well.
Nobody gets banned for having a differing opinion, so knock off the martyr crap.

JuliaAguilar
05-07-2004, 11:33 AM
I must say I agree with the confidentiality argument. But you know, that's something about state/local laws that can be changed. Any of you who thinks that is the way it should be could easily petition the government or write to/call your Congressman, both of which are legal, last I read the Constitution (which was recently, I just took a government class last semester). Seriously, I think you bring about a good point about both parties' names being held in confidence. It really does make a lot of sense.

And hey, before you go around bashing women for getting more priveleges, I work in a job where there are some things women will never EVER get to do, nor will we ever be treated the same as our male counterparts. There are enormous lines drawn between the males and the females in the military, and I've seen it firsthand. So if you want to find a place where men are treated better than women, join the military. Any branch will do. Not that I'm bashing the US military, but it is a sad truth that we women are considered less superior to the men.

RFAlias
05-09-2004, 03:12 PM
lol droog, you know i wasnt seirous about the getting banned :rolleyes: