Riots at Rumsfeld's Speach...

[JustinJJ]

When Rumsfeld was making his apology to the Senate, people stormed in and began to protest. Here is an article on his speach http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/05/07/iraq.abuse.main/index.html I think Rumsfeld is doomed. He should have resigned from office, but now that Bush is keeping him, there's going to be a lot more pissed people. Can't wait for this administration to end!

[Viceroy]

They were hardly causing a riot. Some people shouted at a politician, so what?

A few months ago some people shouted at Tony Blair from the public gallery in Parliament. It was a news story for about 12 hours.

[shade]

He should have resigned from office, but now that Bush is keeping him, there's going to be a lot more pissed people. Can't wait for this administration to end! It doesnt matter. Just like how no matter what the US does, the middle east hates us, no matter what Bush does, the liberals hate him. They hated him before Iraq. Its just a phenomenon. If Bush fired rumsfeld, would they vote for him? No. So why should he give a shit what they have to say?

[pidgeball6]

Yeah, resign, right. Then by that way of thinking, every sec. if def. we've had should've resigned. The marine raped the girl in Okinawa, resign. The Tailhook scandal, resign. Why do the Dems. get sour grapes to this degree?

[xboxfever.com]

It doesnt matter. If Bush fired rumsfeld, would they vote for him? No. So why should he give a shit what they have to say?

That's a classic. I agree 100%. Who gives a fuck what liberals think? If enough people in this country did, then the Libs would be in power. But they don't, and they're not.

'Nuff said.