Brand New Crysis HD Video! *BEST GRAPHICS EVER* [Archive]

NightStalKeR

11-13-2006, 07:33 PM

Well the videos are down, so check out the Picture thread of crysis with awsome new pics!

HERE!
http://forum.ebaumsworld.com/showthread.php?t=170574

Or click on each ones under here

http://www.crysis-online.com/Media/Images/Screenshots/environment_set2.jpg

http://www.crazysalsadancer.com/images/062006_2351_Crysis%20and%201.png

http://techepics.com/files/crysis_image.jpg

http://www.fileshack.com/finclude/images/file032806_crysis.jpg

http://www.guinevere.ca/images/crysis-comparison.jpg

http://crysiscentral.3dactionplanet.gamespy.com/media/screenshots/9-060621.jpg

http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/Articles/Sources/Super_DVD_Creator/images/crysis.jpg

http://www.ecetia.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/07/crysis_69.jpg

http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/8629/crysis25largevy8.jpg

http://www3.incrysis.com/RTsa/RTsa-tech-panorama.jpg

http://incrysis.com/crysis/components/com_ponygallery/img_pictures/0604203_20060420_2020073807.jpg

http://www4.incrysis.com/screenshots/061111-5.jpg

http://static.flickr.com/122/292634382_bf29ea47e5.jpg

http://static.flickr.com/119/292634325_1ace77d3e3.jpg

http://static.flickr.com/103/292633870_1130ce689a.jpg

Here is a picture of the Shader Model 4.0 which crysis will use! Thanks SirKillsAlot :D
http://img489.imageshack.us/img489/4576/1145464167kk3.jpg

http://gotfrags.net/crysis/images/inC/92584-crysis-hud.jpg

http://i12.tinypic.com/2wej2gj.jpg

waterbottl

11-13-2006, 07:47 PM

Service Temporarily Unavailable

The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.

Apache/1.3.33 Server at www3.incrysis.com Port 80

NightStalKeR

11-13-2006, 07:52 PM

Dozula

11-13-2006, 09:56 PM

holy shit is all i can say

kledster

11-13-2006, 10:03 PM

i wish i had the money to get all the hardware and software needed for direct x10. maybe in 3 years i'll get around to getting it :)

weister42

11-13-2006, 10:04 PM

i wish i had the money to get all the hardware and software needed for direct x10. maybe in 3 years i'll get around to getting it :)

What does direct x10 require?

SlOtH

11-13-2006, 10:05 PM

I can't fucking wait for this game. Main reason I'm buying a DX card and vista.

Well I won't be "buying" vista. :idea:

What does direct x10 require?

It requires a Nvidia 8800 series card, a PCI-Express slot, and Windows Vista.

NightStalKeR

11-13-2006, 10:10 PM

I can't fucking wait for this game. Main reason I'm buying a DX card and vista.

Well I won't be "buying" vista. :idea:

It requires a Nvidia 8800 series card, a PCI-Express slot, and Windows Vista.

Exactly same here sloth. I think I will wait till around january though when Directx 10 cards become cheaper and smaller.

SlOtH

11-13-2006, 10:25 PM

Exactly same here sloth. I think I will wait till around january though when Directx 10 cards become cheaper and smaller.

Yeah, of course. I think I heard somewhere they are delaying Crysis even longer. To me it shows that they really want a perfect game and they aren't going to release it with bugs.

rand0m

11-14-2006, 02:02 PM

fuck that video is taking forever to download

firepiss

11-14-2006, 04:04 PM

Video took me an hour to download. Choppy as hell because my cpu can't handle the resolution.

As for the game. It's alright. It didn't raise my eyebrawl.

rand0m

11-14-2006, 05:16 PM

kududoodoop

11-15-2006, 02:35 AM

That game is fucking crazy, you cant appretiate just how complex it by watching a video.

Gears Of War may have some nice graphics, however it doesnt have half the technology Crysis has, from interactive envroment to completely non-linear missions, to online play.

you've never played crysis....

as for technologies, unreal 3 engine has been how many years in the making and has how many technologies? not to mention the unreal engine is the most licensed engine.

and actually gears looks better than crysis, and what do you mean by interactive? because you can use basically anything in your environment as cover in gears...gears has online play too.

not that these two are comparable gameplay wise, but gears of war looks better, and crysis still looks damn good too. Loving how the forest takes damage and shows it very well.

emoisgay

11-15-2006, 03:30 AM

you've never played crysis....

as for technologies, unreal 3 engine has been how many years in the making and has how many technologies? not to mention the unreal engine is the most licensed engine.

and actually gears looks better than crysis, and what do you mean by interactive? because you can use basically anything in your environment as cover in gears...gears has online play too.

not that these two are comparable gameplay wise, but gears of war looks better, and crysis still looks damn good too. Loving how the forest takes damage and shows it very well.

he described it retard...
And you can't even talk about gears and crysis in the same setence, cry blows that game away.

Do we honestly need vista to play this game? If so FUCK THAT SHIT!

rand0m

11-15-2006, 02:18 PM

you've never played crysis....

Ive seen multiple people play it, read multiple reviews about it written by people that play it, seen multiple videos.

as for technologies, unreal 3 engine has been how many years in the making and has how many technologies? not to mention the unreal engine is the most licensed engine.

ZOMG How MANY YEARS??

and actually gears looks better than crysis, and what do you mean by interactive? because you can use basically anything in your environment as cover in gears...gears has online play too.

Im sorry but wtf? Any FPS you can use anything as cover ...

GOW has a 8 man online capability ... Crysis has up to 32.

GOW has 3 game types (all basically just kill the other team) ... Crysis has 4 game modes with one actually been revolutionary

Power Struggle is an entirely new gameplay mode included in multiplayer. It will feature economics to unlock equipment such as weapons and vehicles. New research and unlocking equipment can change the balance of the game. It is designed to offer deep and evolutionary gameplay for players in a multiplayer game. [2]

not that these two are comparable gameplay wise, but gears of war looks better, and crysis still looks damn good too. Loving how the forest takes damage and shows it very well.

Well if you like the linear maps and duck shoot duck shoot duck gameplay inturpted by a movie then sure you'll love GOW.

Crytek2 vs Unreal 3.0?

Unreal 3 looks nice, however Crytek2 feels the best.

Volumetric clouds
Real-time ambient maps
Depth of field
Motion blur
Dynamic Soft shadows
Subsurface scattering
Parallax Mapping
HDR lighting
Fully interactive and destructible environments
Advanced Particle system
Full day-night cycle, with sunrise, and sunset effects

Artless Ib

11-15-2006, 09:27 PM

kududoodoop

11-15-2006, 10:19 PM

he described it retard...
And you can't even talk about gears and crysis in the same setence, cry blows that game away.

Do we honestly need vista to play this game? If so FUCK THAT SHIT!

yeah RETARD, you need vista. it's a DX10 game

kududoodoop

11-15-2006, 10:25 PM

Ive seen multiple people play it, read multiple reviews about it written by people that play it, seen multiple videos.

ZOMG How MANY YEARS??

Im sorry but wtf? Any FPS you can use anything as cover ...

GOW has a 8 man online capability ... Crysis has up to 32.

GOW has 3 game types (all basically just kill the other team) ... Crysis has 4 game modes with one actually been revolutionary

Well if you like the linear maps and duck shoot duck shoot duck gameplay inturpted by a movie then sure you'll love GOW.

Crytek2 vs Unreal 3.0?

Unreal 3 looks nice, however Crytek2 feels the best.

hmm years wise about 4-5 years. well obviously, but you imply it in a way in which doesn't accurately portray it, you need cover in GOW, it's a gameplay aspect, and it's how the game plays, FPS you don't need it, Gears is just more fun.

for the online you can't simply just talk about how many characters and say it's more fun because of that, you obviously have never played GOW, because it's a very tactical team game, it's not a massive 64 person death match, it would defeat the tactics and cover of the game and would be very generic. more people doesn't equal better multiplayer.

1 more game type...cool? revolutionary lol, does it have motion control?

linear maps? have you played far cry? it works just like Gears, it gives you a large environment and a fixed path, yes that's how far cry worked, they created a very good sensation of a massive go-anywhere map.

gears of war = more fun and original than just another FPS, there are so many of them every year and they all get more generic than the last one. Gears is a fresh new experience.

emoisgay

11-16-2006, 12:52 AM

yeah RETARD, you need vista. it's a DX10 game

Oh you can untuck your penis and stop pretending to be a women on her period i asked a simple question you ass hat...

Mr.SelfDestruct

11-16-2006, 01:10 AM

Downloading now...

Crysis looks good, real good. But I have a serious issue with games that require you to have a state of the art computer to run them when they come out. I can appreciate pushing technology, but finding a way to utilize current technology to it's fullest is more important.

That's what makes a "good" game engine. The more a game engine can do with less, the better it is.

Now, I can't say for sure yet whether Crysis is going to ass rape the average gamer's computer out there, but I can tell you that UE3 will be a much gentler date, but still make you scream.

Examples: DOOM 3 and F.E.A.R.
DOOM 3 looks fairly nice, but it's a resource hog. F.E.A.R. manages to look even better and have better physics, but doesn't guzzle all your CPU power. Which is the better engine? The one that requires more power, or the one that has better output?

I'm willing to bet that UE3 will run smoother on a lower end machine than Far Cry does. Yet it will still be visually more impressive, and technilogically superior.

--------

Who cares if it's the most amazing graphics and physics to date if you have to shell out an average of $1500 per 10 frames per second?

Also, I'd put money on UE3's networking being obviously better in the end anyways.

--------

Time will tell...

Edit:

Eh, after watching the video, and taking a look at a few others, for pure graphical abilities, I'd actually have to go with Unreal 3. I don't know if UE3 would be able to do outdoor environments as well as I saw in Crysis though. But as for shading, refraction, lighting, and texture quality, UE3 looks much better.

rand0m

11-16-2006, 01:43 PM

hmm years wise about 4-5 years. well obviously, but you imply it in a way in which doesn't accurately portray it, you need cover in GOW, it's a gameplay aspect, and it's how the game plays, FPS you don't need it, Gears is just more fun.

for the online you can't simply just talk about how many characters and say it's more fun because of that, you obviously have never played GOW, because it's a very tactical team game, it's not a massive 64 person death match, it would defeat the tactics and cover of the game and would be very generic. more people doesn't equal better multiplayer.

1 more game type...cool? revolutionary lol, does it have motion control?

linear maps? have you played far cry? it works just like Gears, it gives you a large environment and a fixed path, yes that's how far cry worked, they created a very good sensation of a massive go-anywhere map.

gears of war = more fun and original than just another FPS, there are so many of them every year and they all get more generic than the last one. Gears is a fresh new experience.

I'm sorry are you going to counter my argument or not.

Oh and Crysis allows you to deside what mission you want to do, what person you want to save. Crysis has no ingame movies.

GOW sends you down set routes and set paths.

1 more game type, well one that certainly has alot more elements to it than the GOW 5 seconds match play.

Gameplay, well ok you both shoot people in this, however Crysis you can do about 100 x more things to the envrioment than you can in GOW, which basically takes the gameplay to the next level.

Mr.SelfDestruct

11-16-2006, 01:55 PM

Meh, I see them shooting down trees and blowing up a couple buildings. Half-Life 2 can pull that off extremely well, and some of the Mods even allow construction of objects from basic parts.

I'm starting to become more and more dissapointed with games nowadays. It's simply the same old stuff over and over again. Crysis looks pretty, but those physics have been done before. I want an FPS that actually REALLY makes you utilize the physics for gameplay. Hell, make a sort of shipwrecked mod on the game where you have to use the objects about you to build a shelter, or a raft, maybe find some food, make some tools.

We've seen a couple thousand FPS's before. Instead of adding physics to the FPS, why not add FPS to the phsyics? Change the core of gameplay.

Unfortuanately, the only games we ever see that really think outside the box are all small-time. They don't have the money or manpower that these big name developers do.

Want to see something that blows away Crysis and UT2k7? Go take a look at some videos about a game called "Infinity: Quest for Earth" (being developed by a very small group of people, maybe just one guy, can't remember). The capabilities of that engine are completely ground breaking, and if some more developers take steps that guys like this do, we might really see some impressive stuff. I guarantee that this little known small named title will blow your mind.

Infinity: Quest for Earth

Check it out.

rand0m

11-16-2006, 03:03 PM

Is that the one where you can roam an entire planet, and fly to others. Cus that was pretty awsome.

Oh btw the Hl2 physics engine was very very awsome, however the physics in it cant be used the way Crysis is been used, ie plants and follage actually react like normal plants, oceans have waves, building actually fall completely appart etc.

Mr.SelfDestruct

11-16-2006, 03:40 PM

I'm curious to see if the waves from the ocean are actually part of the water volume, or if it's just a graphical representation.

It'd be a helluva engine that could manage to change the water volume real time to keep up with waves and such on top of everything else. Than again, in a game like this, there wouldn't be much of a purpose unless there's speedboat missions or something.

Edit:

Oh, and yes. Infinity is that one that kicks ass in general. Fly from the mountainside of a planet to a canyon on another in another solar system. All 100% seemless, no load times between land and space, no loading between systems.

NightStalKeR

11-16-2006, 04:26 PM

Realised the videos are all down...

For those who complain about caring too much on graphics I have this to say.

"Us human beings are reaching a new stage of evolution.
It's a technological stage.
We don't realize this, but it's becoming more and more apparent that such technological advancement is what we are now biologically striving for."

I'm curious to see if the waves from the ocean are actually part of the water volume, or if it's just a graphical representation.

Well check this picture out! http://www.crysis-online.com/Media/Images/Screenshots/environment_set2.jpg

Mr.SelfDestruct

11-16-2006, 04:40 PM

I think you missed what I was trying to say, which is not any fault of yours. It's a bit difficult to explain what I mean.

Think of a speedboat racing across the water. Now if those waves are actually part of the water volume, than the speedboat will ride those waves... if they're purely graphical though, than you might see the wave in front of you, but the surface of the water volume will still be flat, so the boat will pass through the wave instead.

Get what I mean?

rand0m

11-16-2006, 05:09 PM

I think the water will be moving up and down, however i doubt you will fully interact with the water, since even movies have trouble rendering water that way.

However as for the Water texture and movement, it will look very nice.

Rootraz

11-16-2006, 07:33 PM

ahhh gay i thought this was a ps3 game. a question, can a ps3 get graphics as good as this, tut a year ago ps3 looked amazing, its a total anti climax. and the frame rate on some ps3 games looks lame. all we can do is hope

http://uk.media.ps3.ign.com/media/825/825893/vids_1.html

these graphics look good tho

Actually that's a very good possility because Crytek is developing a game for the PS3 and the common belief is that it will be Crysis