PDA

View Full Version : IGN: And the award for Best New Console goes to...


Wu-tang
12-22-2006, 03:05 AM
http://bestof.ign.com/2006/gear/1.html

PS3! Haha, I didn't see it coming(especially with the bad press it's been getting[fuck time magazine]), but hey, I'll accept it.

There's a couple other cool things in that article as well. But this was the most interesting point from it.

ZeroTigerX
12-22-2006, 03:12 AM
It's true. The PS3 has both innovation and a thinning gap between computer and console. It may be expensive but it seems to reach the furthest into "next-gen" out of the 3.

Farmer77
12-22-2006, 04:33 AM
No, category for video game console commercials for the year? Playstation 3 had the coolest commercials while Nintendo Wii had two japanese guys going to people's houses with crappy music.

rand0m
12-22-2006, 07:34 AM
Judging the consoles based upon a broad perspective that includes software now available and coming in the future an entirely different argument could be formulated. However, from a hardware perspective, the PS3 is by far the more interesting console. Though the launch software hasn't blown anyone away, the 360's launch titles were equally unimpressive, and the system will certainly mature. Sony's embrace of the PS3 as a computer rather than just a console, and the availability of supported Linux distributions for the console will also develop and will likely bear entirely unexpected fruit in future.

w000t I swear the Wii was going to win though ...

Slug Moses
12-22-2006, 11:43 AM
IGN is more bias than Foxnews..... :motz_6:

Duckels
12-22-2006, 12:01 PM
IGN is more bias than Foxnews..... :motz_6:

So does that make foxnews as bias as CNN?

kledster
12-22-2006, 02:27 PM
just a few weeks ago some people here were complaining how IGN was biased 360 fanboys. that's quite funny.

Slug Moses
12-22-2006, 02:45 PM
just a few weeks ago some people here were complaining how IGN was biased 360 fanboys. that's quite funny.
They are biased against the Wii, because it's not for "gamers" or whatever.

Spike Lee
12-22-2006, 02:56 PM
The wii only garnered publicity because people were not willing to pay full price. They went with Nintendo because critics loved the way they were going with it and decided to promote it to the internet.

Few people failed to realize that just because the Wii came after the 360, that it did not mean it was as powerful as the 360.

And the whole "video games were meant to be fun" and "who cares about graphics" arguments can only go so far untill developers start not giving a shit about graphics. Video games were meant to be fun and to give control over a realistic enviorment.

Deal with it.

firepiss
12-22-2006, 03:02 PM
I have no problem ps3 being the winner...but ign reasons for Wii being the runner up....

Nintendo's Wii launched to massive mainstream applause and a lot of hope has been placed in the potential for gaming innovation via the console's unique controller. Nintendo disappointed some, however, by choosing not embrace HDTV or to compete with Sony and Microsoft in processing power. The Wii can't even play normal DVDs.

So that's the reason why the Wii lost? No HD graphics? Non DVD features?What does that have to do with video gaming?:rolleyes:

Well, fuck ign.com

I'll just stop going to that website, not because of just this. But because Wii editor Matt doesn't seem to be on board with this wii.

Papero
12-22-2006, 03:13 PM
I'm not surprised PS3 won, it's quite the machine.

In the end my computer is still faster and overall better then a PS3 and the Xbox360 has titles that interest me more. ;)

xeoset
12-22-2006, 03:25 PM
Was the 360 even in this? It says best NEW Console and only states the Runner-Up (the Wii) and Winner (PS3). The 360's been out a year, I would of thought they would give last place at least a mention. :confused:

Marcos2990
12-22-2006, 03:35 PM
it was between the ps3 and the wii because xbox360 came out last year. Thats why it is console of the year

Wu-tang
12-22-2006, 03:36 PM
Was the 360 even in this? It says best NEW Console and only states the Runner-Up (the Wii) and Winner (PS3). The 360's been out a year, I would of thought they would give last place at least a mention. :confused:
It was the best new console of 2006.


I always thought that IGN.com wasn't that biased and was supportive of the Wii. Weird, and that gamespot was ridiculously biased towards the 360.

rand0m
12-22-2006, 04:41 PM
Guess the PS3 is showing the most promise then ... ?

Dam that was stupid Fanboy remark, damn damn damn.

xeoset
12-22-2006, 04:46 PM
Guess the PS3 is showing the most promise then ... ?

Dam that was stupid Fanboy remark, damn damn damn.

It was between Consoles. As a Console I say the PS3 is better, it's no contest. But from my point of view, Nintendo's Game Roster is sweeping Sony's aside. From the award aspect, they were very well correct with their Choice.

It'd be interesting to see IGN's comparison between the Juggernauts.

ZeroTigerX
12-22-2006, 07:40 PM
In EGM like 6/6 guys chose the Wii.

Molson
12-22-2006, 09:23 PM
It's true. The PS3 has both innovation and a thinning gap between computer and console. It may be expensive but it seems to reach the furthest into "next-gen" out of the 3.

whats innovative about the PS3 again?

Spike Lee
12-22-2006, 09:28 PM
Manufactuers can churn games out that can go all out. Wii has limitations compared to the PS3. Blu-Ray capability will mean that developers can use that technology and milk it.

sublimej311
12-23-2006, 12:19 AM
Um, how would the 360 win best new console of '06?

Edit: Nevermind just read through the thread.

Meth
12-23-2006, 12:46 AM
So that's the reason why the Wii lost? No HD graphics? Non DVD features?What does that have to do with video gaming?:rolleyes:

Well, fuck ign.com

I'll just stop going to that website, not because of just this. But because Wii editor Matt doesn't seem to be on board with this wii.

Alot more gamers watch porn nower days.They need dvd features that bad.

ZeroTigerX
12-23-2006, 01:12 AM
whats innovative about the PS3 again?

New standard equipment found optional on other systems, 7 core processor, standard wireless controller with motion ability, the ability to partion your HD and install Linux, memory cards obsolete as yo can use ANY STORAGE DEVICE to put your saved games on and transfer them, this includes MP3 players, CDs, Flash Drives, Memory Stick/SD Card/CF card, External HD, PSP connectivity with Remote Play and the transfering of PS1 titles and also using the PSP for some PS3 games, Next generation discs with high storage capacity, up to 7 controllers, the ability to use a USB gamepad as a controller (I've tested), the ease to upgrade your HD, and as shown with the PSP, a firmware updates can add a lot. Look at what the PSP could do at first and now look what it could do.

Good try though. You could pretend that the other systens are as innovative as that. The Wii controller is very innovative, but it ends at that.

Molson
12-23-2006, 02:27 AM
New standard equipment found optional on other systems, 7 core processor, standard wireless controller with motion ability, the ability to partion your HD and install Linux, memory cards obsolete as yo can use ANY STORAGE DEVICE to put your saved games on and transfer them, this includes MP3 players, CDs, Flash Drives, Memory Stick/SD Card/CF card, External HD, PSP connectivity with Remote Play and the transfering of PS1 titles and also using the PSP for some PS3 games, Next generation discs with high storage capacity, up to 7 controllers, the ability to use a USB gamepad as a controller (I've tested), the ease to upgrade your HD, and as shown with the PSP, a firmware updates can add a lot. Look at what the PSP could do at first and now look what it could do.

Good try though. You could pretend that the other systens are as innovative as that. The Wii controller is very innovative, but it ends at that.

take it easy big guy, i was asking a simple question. i dont care for any of the console right now. and shit, even i know the Wii has more going for it than a gimmicky controller, so "good try."

SIKKENT
12-23-2006, 06:41 AM
remember, its not about innovation or games......its the actual console thats being judged. in terms of a console, the ps3 shits all over the wii (and has the edge over the 360) people cant say:: OMG this sucks wii is way better, because in terms of a console, it isn't.

rand0m
12-23-2006, 09:13 AM
even i know the Wii has more going for it than a gimmicky controller, so "good try."

Really? What else does it offer aside from the controllers motion sensing ablities that the other consoles don't offer?

troutofdoom
12-23-2006, 10:22 AM
Really? What else does it offer aside from the controllers motion sensing ablities that the other consoles don't offer?

Nintendo franchises, cheaper development (a platform for new IPs and great games that don't need HD crap). Uh, decent software sales for developers (360 does, PS3 won't for a while). Forecast/News channel~! Jessica Alba on your Wii.

And it costs half as much. That may not mean much to you, but to a lot of people that means more than high res graphics.

Slug Moses
12-23-2006, 01:30 PM
Really? What else does it offer aside from the controllers motion sensing ablities that the other consoles don't offer?
It offers a real party gaming atmosphere. Me and my group of friends have had so much fun with the Wii, way more fun than any other console, and that's only Wii Sports and Monkeyball. I can't wait to get Smash Brothers and more two+ player games. If you have lots of friends coming over wanting to be entertained (like I do), the Wii may actually become a nightmare, because you won't be able to get them to quit!!

If I want hardcore games and super high res graphics, I just close firefox here, and load one up. ;)

rand0m
12-23-2006, 01:38 PM
Nintendo franchises, cheaper development (a platform for new IPs and great games that don't need HD crap). Uh, decent software sales for developers (360 does, PS3 won't for a while). Forecast/News channel~! Jessica Alba on your Wii.

And it costs half as much. That may not mean much to you, but to a lot of people that means more than high res graphics.

Nintendo Franchises? Cheaper Developement? blah blah blah.

Ok but why did they make an entire new console? Why didnt they just make the Wii mote and addon for the gamecube?

It offers a real party gaming atmosphere. Me and my group of friends have had so much fun with the Wii, way more fun than any other console, and that's only Wii Sports and Monkeyball. I can't wait to get Smash Brothers and more two+ player games. If you have lots of friends coming over wanting to be entertained (like I do), the Wii may actually become a nightmare, because you won't be able to get them to quit!!

If I want hardcore games and super high res graphics, I just close firefox here, and load one up. ;)

Woow Ive had just as much fun playing 2v2 on my ps2 with my friends, however to be honest, i dont really wanna play video games when my friends come round, i wanna go out and do actual stuff ...

Slug Moses
12-23-2006, 01:54 PM
Woow Ive had just as much fun playing 2v2 on my ps2 with my friends, however to be honest, i dont really wanna play video games when my friends come round, i wanna go out and do actual stuff ...
Well, I'm a bit older, so when my friends come over they want to drink all my booze, borrow my stuff, or just escape from their wives for a bit.

I've played pretty much every console ever made, and nothing brings out the fun like the Wii. I think it's because, like the old consoles such as Atari 2600 and the NES, the Wii offers, in addition to great single player games, simple, fun games that anyone can pick up and play.

I also realize that "gamers" don't like the Wii for this same reason. I think that is stupid as hell. It's a very childish mentality.

rand0m
12-23-2006, 02:01 PM
I also realize that "gamers" don't like the Wii for this same reason. I think that is stupid as hell. It's a very childish mentality.

No, its because it cripples any aspect for new gaming innovation. Can developers dive into the physics world with the Wii? No because it cant handle mass physical calculations. Can developers write better AI for characters? No, because the Wii can handle the pathfinding abilites need for advanced AI. Can developers program in a more intelligent more realisitic enviroment? No because the Wii doesnt have enough memory or the power to run it all.

Nintendo constanly go on about how their new console will actually let the developers concentrate on making more intressting games. However aside from motion sensing controller the only things their going to be able to do is re-write old code and hope to god that somewhere in the changes they made something might suddenly click and make that game even better than the game before.

However in the real world all thats going to come out of the Wii are, rehashed repetative old games which people are going to get bored sooner and sooner.

I myself will not get a Wii, why? because i feel the Wii is more of a GameCube 1.5 not a next gen console offering next gen games.

Slug Moses
12-23-2006, 02:11 PM
You're missing the point, random. All that doesn't mean shit. It's not about what could be, it's about what is happening now. My pc stomps all three consoles combined and I have the most advanced games on the market for it, but why is it that I'm out there playing Zelda and having massive bowling tournaments until 6 am on the Wii?
I myself will not get a Wii, why? because i feel the Wii is more of a GameCube 1.5 not a next gen console offering next gen games.
That's exactly how I feel about all the consoles, to tell you the truth. At least the Wii offers a new controller scheme.

xeoset
12-23-2006, 02:39 PM
Nintendo franchises, cheaper development (a platform for new IPs and great games that don't need HD crap). Uh, decent software sales for developers (360 does, PS3 won't for a while). Forecast/News channel~! Jessica Alba on your Wii.

And it costs half as much. That may not mean much to you, but to a lot of people that means more than high res graphics.

As rand0m asked. What does the Console give us, the only viable answer there was Nintendo Franchises, the reason I bought the Wii. The other stuff you mentioned is just ditsy rubbish thrown in to make that list longer. I want Games, I don't care how much the Devs. have to pay to actually develop as long as it's at least an AA Title.

Nintendo has great Ideas for the Software of the Console, like the Weather Channel, but sooner or later the Processes will get worse because of lack of Hardware, Ninty have really restricted themselves. From what I see Nintendo are playing for hit and miss hear like Sony. Sony are taking a HUGE risk with Blu-Ray while Nintendo are playing their cards on a largely inferior System and Motion Sensing isn't going to save them, it's just how many people they can persuade to play with it.

SIKKENT
12-23-2006, 06:50 PM
Nintendo has great Ideas for the Software of the Console, like the Weather Channel.

that made me laugh

firepiss
12-23-2006, 07:45 PM
As rand0m asked. What does the Console give us, the only viable answer there was Nintendo Franchises, the reason I bought the Wii. The other stuff you mentioned is just ditsy rubbish thrown in to make that list longer. I want Games, I don't care how much the Devs. have to pay to actually develop as long as it's at least an AA Title.

Nintendo has great Ideas for the Software of the Console, like the Weather Channel, but sooner or later the Processes will get worse because of lack of Hardware, Ninty have really restricted themselves. From what I see Nintendo are playing for hit and miss hear like Sony. Sony are taking a HUGE risk with Blu-Ray while Nintendo are playing their cards on a largely inferior System and Motion Sensing isn't going to save them, it's just how many people they can persuade to play with it.

Have you even looked at the lastest sell charts? Wii is still selling like hotcakes.

You said the reason why you purchased the wii was because of the franchises? I thought you hated nintendo franchises such as Zelda because you thought link looks like tinker bell off of peter pan?

Motion Sensing is something nintendo should strike gold on some level. We already know that Wii will do better than the gamecube which is actually good step forward.

Beside that, I personally think blue ray is better than HD. I actually hope Blue Ray kills this HD.

aoplayo
12-23-2006, 09:39 PM
I don't understand why you guys have to argue over which one is better. I bet nobody here has all three and just like to base everything off what they think.

It is truly ridiculous. Totally and utterly ridiculous to argue over which console is better when it has no effect on you.

B-MetalSucks
12-23-2006, 09:51 PM
I don't understand why you guys have to argue over which one is better. I bet nobody here has all three and just like to base everything off what they think.

It is truly ridiculous. Totally and utterly ridiculous to argue over which console is better when it has no effect on you.
But it's what fanboys do. What else do you expect from them? You see to a fanboy "his system" is like his penis, and he must gloat over it and command it be recognized as the superior system. For were it not so it would mean his penis is small. Of course the truth of the matter is that they are just like the old guys driving sports cars, they are making up for their shortcomings but doing it by arguing about consoles because they can't afford fancy cars. That's just my .02 though.

weister42
12-23-2006, 09:52 PM
When the big titles for PS3 comes out it'll be more even to compare, since current PS3 games only use ~10% of PS3's processing power.

PS3 stated out rough but it should gain support as time goes. And, if you're a TRUE gamer you won't be biased towards any system, just games.

I will buy a 360 when Halo 3 comes out.
I will buy a Wii when more virtual titles are out.
I will buy a PS3 when they cut the price and have a game that showcase PS3's capability.
I will buy a new computer when my current computer can no longer handle today's games.