patriotwarrior7
12-29-2006, 12:05 AM
US says global warming threatens polar bears (http://www.ft.com/cms/s/f673569a-95ff-11db-9976-0000779e2340.html)
By Stephanie Kirchgaessner in New York
Published: December 27 2006 23:30 | Last updated: December 27 2006 23:30
Polar bears should be classified as a threatened species because global warming could cause their habitat to melt away, the Bush administration said on Wednesday.
The iconic arctic animals were being threatened by receding ice, said Dirk Kempthorne, secretary of the Interior Department, who stopped short of calling for an investigation into the causes of climate change, saying the issue was beyond his department’s remit.
“We need to just concentrate and focus on the species and its habitat,” he said, adding the George W. Bush administration had already spent $29bn researching climate change issues and related technology.
While the proposal did not represent a clear departure from the Bush administration’s stance on global warming, it marked the first time the White House had pointed to climate change as a phenomenon that could threaten the survival of a species.
Administration officials said they proposed adding polar bears to the threatened species list because Fish and Wildlife Service biologists feared that Alaska’s population of polar bears could experience a significant decline in the future.
There are thought to be between 20,000 and 25,000 polar bears worldwide, most living in Greenland and Norway. But almost 5,000 live mainly in Alaska and travel to Canada and Russia.
Recent scientific studies of adult polar bears in Canada and in Alaska’s Southern Beaufort Sea found have found weight loss among the species and reduced cub survival. In Canada’s western Hudson Bay, the population of polar bears has already declined 22 per cent.
The Fish and Wildlife Service will initiate a 12-month review of polar bears’ current and future status before determining whether the species should be placed on the threatened list.
Dale Hall, director of the US Fish and Wildlife Service, said that if the polar bear was placed on the threatened list, the service would engage groups ranging from Alaskans to native Americans to scientists to “sit down and help us craft a recovery plan”.
Although Mr Kempthorne said the nation’s fish and wildlife service would not be asked to make a determination on why arctic sea ice was thinning, he emphasised that one potential environmental factor – oil and gas exploration – had “no negative impact on polar bears”.
The conclusion contradicted a separate statement by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, which said that demands of oil and natural gas, and other resources in Alaska have led to “some conflicts” between polar bears and humans.
Ed Markey, a senior Democratic lawmaker on the House energy committee, said that the development “may signal the beginning of the end” of the Bush administration’s policy of “global warming denial”.
“After giving the cold shoulder to conservation, Kyoto, and better fuel economy standards, they seem to be warming up to protecting an icon of American wildlife,” Mr Markey said.
Separately, Shell said on Wednesday it had hired Gale Norton, the former secretary of the Interior Department, to serve as a counsel for the Dutch oil giant.
The announcement from the energy company comes as the Bush administration is expected to face increased scrutiny by Congress on its ties to the oil and gas industry. This could include questions about whether the Interior Department has adequately collected royalty payments from oil and gas groups extracting resources from federally owned land.
[/quote]
I saw a Discovery Channel (well, one of those channels) show yesterday about how the iceberg that sank the Titanic was formed and how it ended up where it did (the dynamics of an iceberg, etc).
Anyhow, at the end they mentioned that global warming could melt the ice pack which would then affect the currents in the north Atlantic, which would then bring on an ice age.....or something like that. I wasn't paying attention that closely, and it surprised me with its weird logic (warming will cause melting which will cause freezing).
Anyhow, at the end they mentioned that global warming could melt the ice pack which would then affect the currents in the north Atlantic, which would then bring on an ice age.....or something like that. I wasn't paying attention that closely, and it surprised me with its weird logic (warming will cause melting which will cause freezing).
I think I need to stand on a street corner tomorrow and yell at cars as they pass by:
"Why do you hate the polar bears?!?"
By Stephanie Kirchgaessner in New York
Published: December 27 2006 23:30 | Last updated: December 27 2006 23:30
Polar bears should be classified as a threatened species because global warming could cause their habitat to melt away, the Bush administration said on Wednesday.
The iconic arctic animals were being threatened by receding ice, said Dirk Kempthorne, secretary of the Interior Department, who stopped short of calling for an investigation into the causes of climate change, saying the issue was beyond his department’s remit.
“We need to just concentrate and focus on the species and its habitat,” he said, adding the George W. Bush administration had already spent $29bn researching climate change issues and related technology.
While the proposal did not represent a clear departure from the Bush administration’s stance on global warming, it marked the first time the White House had pointed to climate change as a phenomenon that could threaten the survival of a species.
Administration officials said they proposed adding polar bears to the threatened species list because Fish and Wildlife Service biologists feared that Alaska’s population of polar bears could experience a significant decline in the future.
There are thought to be between 20,000 and 25,000 polar bears worldwide, most living in Greenland and Norway. But almost 5,000 live mainly in Alaska and travel to Canada and Russia.
Recent scientific studies of adult polar bears in Canada and in Alaska’s Southern Beaufort Sea found have found weight loss among the species and reduced cub survival. In Canada’s western Hudson Bay, the population of polar bears has already declined 22 per cent.
The Fish and Wildlife Service will initiate a 12-month review of polar bears’ current and future status before determining whether the species should be placed on the threatened list.
Dale Hall, director of the US Fish and Wildlife Service, said that if the polar bear was placed on the threatened list, the service would engage groups ranging from Alaskans to native Americans to scientists to “sit down and help us craft a recovery plan”.
Although Mr Kempthorne said the nation’s fish and wildlife service would not be asked to make a determination on why arctic sea ice was thinning, he emphasised that one potential environmental factor – oil and gas exploration – had “no negative impact on polar bears”.
The conclusion contradicted a separate statement by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, which said that demands of oil and natural gas, and other resources in Alaska have led to “some conflicts” between polar bears and humans.
Ed Markey, a senior Democratic lawmaker on the House energy committee, said that the development “may signal the beginning of the end” of the Bush administration’s policy of “global warming denial”.
“After giving the cold shoulder to conservation, Kyoto, and better fuel economy standards, they seem to be warming up to protecting an icon of American wildlife,” Mr Markey said.
Separately, Shell said on Wednesday it had hired Gale Norton, the former secretary of the Interior Department, to serve as a counsel for the Dutch oil giant.
The announcement from the energy company comes as the Bush administration is expected to face increased scrutiny by Congress on its ties to the oil and gas industry. This could include questions about whether the Interior Department has adequately collected royalty payments from oil and gas groups extracting resources from federally owned land.
[/quote]
I saw a Discovery Channel (well, one of those channels) show yesterday about how the iceberg that sank the Titanic was formed and how it ended up where it did (the dynamics of an iceberg, etc).
Anyhow, at the end they mentioned that global warming could melt the ice pack which would then affect the currents in the north Atlantic, which would then bring on an ice age.....or something like that. I wasn't paying attention that closely, and it surprised me with its weird logic (warming will cause melting which will cause freezing).
Anyhow, at the end they mentioned that global warming could melt the ice pack which would then affect the currents in the north Atlantic, which would then bring on an ice age.....or something like that. I wasn't paying attention that closely, and it surprised me with its weird logic (warming will cause melting which will cause freezing).
I think I need to stand on a street corner tomorrow and yell at cars as they pass by:
"Why do you hate the polar bears?!?"