PDA

View Full Version : crysis beta out for everyone


rashbeep
10-01-2007, 07:46 PM
go get it now while its still out..

http://www.fileplanet.com/promotions/crysis/beta/

Zero-Man
10-01-2007, 07:48 PM
FUCK i just made thread less than .1 seconds ago

silverspade14
10-01-2007, 07:53 PM
w00t. Cant wait for this download to finish.

Zero-Man
10-01-2007, 07:55 PM
im 526. over 1000

20 minutes left till i start downloading

DarkTalon
10-01-2007, 08:03 PM
my computer is so shitty the crysis WEBSITE brings my fps down to like 4.

lordfarquad
10-01-2007, 08:06 PM
WTF
Dude, my computer is WAY above the system requirements (E6600 OCed, 8800GTS, 3 GB RAM, 500GB HDD) but it says im below. What a bunch of BS

Someone send me the link after the screen that says "Join the Beta"

Jonathan
10-01-2007, 08:07 PM
zero what are your specs? For some reason it says my specs suck.. but I could play bioshock and what not pretty decently...

silverspade14
10-01-2007, 08:19 PM
WTF
Dude, my computer is WAY above the system requirements (E6600 OCed, 8800GTS, 3 GB RAM, 500GB HDD) but it says im below. What a bunch of BS

Someone send me the link after the screen that says "Join the Beta"

It didnt even ask me for my specs.

rashbeep
10-01-2007, 08:28 PM
LOL at our threads being made at like the same minute.. but seriously, this is great news for non subscribers, and soon they will join in on the fun :)

Bicepto
10-01-2007, 08:41 PM
waiting in line now bitch.

silverspade14
10-01-2007, 08:45 PM
What the fuck. I forgot I was downloading and my dad told me to reset the wireless, now I have to wait 46 minutes again even though it says I'm number 164 in line.

Papero
10-01-2007, 08:47 PM
Sweet, if this is a public beta why is there a NDA? I have the key and what not, 24 mins to download but a NDA seems strange.

lordfarquad
10-01-2007, 08:47 PM
Hey someone wanna make me a key? After you use your key for the beta and all clear your cookies of fileplanet and sign up again to get a key, and PM it to me ;) I'll luv you forever!
edit: I FUCKING GOT IT!! YES!!

silverspade14
10-01-2007, 08:52 PM
Hey someone wanna make me a key? After you use your key for the beta and all clear your cookies of fileplanet and sign up again to get a key, and PM it to me ;) I'll luv you forever!

Or you could do it yourself.

Edit: OK its downloading now but its slow as fuck.

Zero-Man
10-01-2007, 09:08 PM
i lied my ass off :) but i can run it i have bioshock on high

skater910
10-01-2007, 09:14 PM
I almost flipped when I made a whole new account to get by the minimum specs check and it didn't work. I then cleared my cookies, which made me avoid putting my fist through my monitor. The official specs say I can run this on low, so fuck you Fileplanet.

rashbeep
10-01-2007, 09:30 PM
i'm just letting you know now, performance in vista is wayy worse than xp.. but remember this is a beta and performance is already improved with the 3rd client. but still, i have an 8800 gtx, and an e6700 c2d, and 2 gigs of ram, and am still running it all high settings with only 1024 by 768 res.

CSPope
10-01-2007, 09:46 PM
what the fuck!?

I was 5 min in the line and it refreshes and shows 46 minutes.

I fucking hate fileplanet. Whoever thought of the idea should be torn the pieces!!!

W/e I have to wait 33 min now and then probably another 2 hours b/c their speed will probably be like 200 KB/s.

Zero-Man
10-01-2007, 09:58 PM
im 11% done this shit , its gonna be an overnight dl Why cant they do it as a torrent Fuck

silverspade14
10-01-2007, 10:03 PM
what the fuck!?

I was 5 min in the line and it refreshes and shows 46 minutes.

I fucking hate fileplanet. Whoever thought of the idea should be torn the pieces!!!

W/e I have to wait 33 min now and then probably another 2 hours b/c their speed will probably be like 200 KB/s.

Try 90 KB/s haha. This is taking forever.

SlOtH
10-01-2007, 10:09 PM
How big is the exe? I'm 400th in line on the east coast server, lulz.

silverspade14
10-01-2007, 10:14 PM
How big is the exe? I'm 400th in line on the east coast server, lulz.

1.38 gigabytes.

Jonathan
10-01-2007, 10:37 PM
i got it... but had to lie about my system specs D=
EDIT: will it run with a 2.0ghz double core?

rashbeep
10-01-2007, 10:53 PM
most likely, but it also depends on your os

Papero
10-01-2007, 11:08 PM
26% here my niggas, hasn't gone past 70kb/s yet.

I just went to that canyourunit website to test Crysis, apparently my computer fails.

It put it as SUPER fail all because of my conroe being only 1.8ghz, everything else passed a couple bars then needed.

Fuck that website, I bet i'll get 30fps med settings.

diablo234
10-01-2007, 11:14 PM
oh man, its really gonna be filled now, makes me glad CT is getting a passworded server. well at least we will have more people, closed beta was as empty as my soul.

CSPope
10-01-2007, 11:23 PM
Try 90 KB/s haha. This is taking forever.

Only 2.5 hours left for me!!! :squint:

26% here my niggas, hasn't gone past 70kb/s yet.

I just went to that canyourunit website to test Crysis, apparently my computer fails.

It put it as SUPER fail all because of my conroe being only 1.8ghz, everything else passed a couple bars then needed.

Fuck that website, I bet i'll get 30fps med settings.

It said I failed too b/c my cpu is only at 2.6 GHz. I'll be able to run it though at a good fps.

Minimum: Intel Pentium 4 2.8 GHz (3.2 GHz for Vista) or faster, Intel Core 2.0 GHz (2.2 GHz for Vista) or faster, AMD Athlon 2800+ (3200+ for Vista) or faster.
You Have: 2 processors running - AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5200+
I like how it says I failed the cpu speed but a 3200+ is minimum.

Zero-Man
10-02-2007, 12:54 AM
31% awesome... overnight shit gonna go to sleep

skater910
10-02-2007, 12:57 AM
Jesus Christ, am I missing a patch or something? Nearly every texture is yellow and black. My ping is 200 at best on a ten-person server. Some textures load as the game progresses. The maps are completely empty due to the low population. I can run everything incredibly smoothly at low, but I swear that over 50% of the textures are placeholders. Maybe it's just my RAM, but it's looking like ass so far. Is this just to shit on low-end computers or is there placeholders on every setting? Am I missing a key patch and the servers still let me connect? I tried checking for the latest version but EA's stupid fucking website won't load, a symptom of being so flashy that it fucks everything up.

I didn't download this and expect to be shooting trees apart and tearing down shanties, but I did expect a game that looks to be at least at the alpha stage. What's wrong?

Important specs:
AMD Athlon 3500+
Geforce 6800 GS (oc'd)
1GB RAM

Whodi86
10-02-2007, 01:25 AM
Damnit, I don't understand Canyourunit.com. It says my gpu fails the recommended system requirements for Crysis. Does this mean because my laptop is a 512mb go 7900 gtx that it isn't supported? I thought the go 7900 gtx was equivalent to a 7900gs and the requirement says 7800 series or better. Shouldn't I meet the recommended requirements?

It also says I fail the cpu since I need a "Core 2 Duo/Athlon X2 or better", but I have "2 processors running - Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz". Shouldn't this also mean I pass?

Whatever, won't stop me from enjoying this beta, but I just don't understand why I don't meet the requirements. Can anyone help me out here?

Edit: The recommended gpu requirements also lists each feature(512mb video ram, 3D acceleration, video HW transform and lighting, vertex shader 3.0, and pixel shader 3.0) which I pass on every one.

skater910
10-02-2007, 01:26 AM
Damnit, I don't understand Canyourunit.com. It says I fail the recommended system requirements for Crysis. Does this mean because my laptop is a 512mb go 7900 gtx, that it isn't supported? I thought the go 7900 gtx was equivalent to a 7900gs and the requirement says 7800 series or better. Shouldn't I meet the recommended requirements?

It also says I fail the cpu since I need a "Core 2 Duo/Athlon X2 or better", but I have "2 processors running - Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz". Shouldn't this also mean I pass?

Whatever, won't stop me from enjoying this beta, but I just don't understand why I don't meet the requirements. Can anyone help me out here?

You should definitely be fine running at least medium, maybe medium-high.

Whodi86
10-02-2007, 01:42 AM
If I could just play on medium with a good fps(30), I'd be happy.

CSPope
10-02-2007, 02:04 AM
Jesus Christ, am I missing a patch or something? Nearly every texture is yellow and black. My ping is 200 at best on a ten-person server. Some textures load as the game progresses. The maps are completely empty due to the low population. I can run everything incredibly smoothly at low, but I swear that over 50% of the textures are placeholders. Maybe it's just my RAM, but it's looking like ass so far. Is this just to shit on low-end computers or is there placeholders on every setting? Am I missing a key patch and the servers still let me connect? I tried checking for the latest version but EA's stupid fucking website won't load, a symptom of being so flashy that it fucks everything up.

I didn't download this and expect to be shooting trees apart and tearing down shanties, but I did expect a game that looks to be at least at the alpha stage. What's wrong?

Important specs:
AMD Athlon 3500+
Geforce 6800 GS (oc'd)
1GB RAM
Well... kinda disappointing for a public beta. I couldn't see shit in game except the ground and the shadows of buildings. It took me 20 minutes to find the way out of spawn.

It started out with a shitload of missing textures but it got better as time went by.

I hope it gets more.... playable soon =]
It better.... I preordered.

From what I've tinkered around with. I can run it smooth at medium settings with most set to medium, some set to low (shadows) and most set to medium with a decent fps.

My specs:
AMD Athlon 64 5200+ X2
Geforce 7600GT
2 GB RAM

sublimej311
10-02-2007, 03:01 AM
If you're looking for a new GFX card try the 2900PRO, best card for the price. Prices are supposed to drop soon as well. I'll probably get this one next month.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102706

Whodi86
10-02-2007, 03:05 AM
If anyone is going to download this, do it now. My speed is at 750 KB/s and only 25 minutes to go.

Wow, the 2900XT looks unbelievable. It has fucking 1 gb of GDDR4 memory! Too bad it's near impossible to pull out video cards in notebooks.

Macro
10-02-2007, 04:35 AM
Crysis will own my life.

Whodi86
10-02-2007, 04:42 AM
I just played it on medium settings, and I was missing a shit load of textures. I waited a few minutes and said fuck it. Is anyone else experiencing this?

lordfarquad
10-02-2007, 07:29 AM
Wow this game is really glitchy, I was missing a bunch of textures, and on my high end PC (core 2 duo, 8800gts640, 3 gb ram) it was playing all right on high settings. everything would go smooth then it would just jerk and shit.

Flesh Warlord
10-02-2007, 08:30 AM
Wow this game is really glitchy, I was missing a bunch of textures, and on my high end PC (core 2 duo, 8800gts640, 3 gb ram) it was playing all right on high settings. everything would go smooth then it would just jerk and shit.

That's why it's a beta.

rand0m
10-02-2007, 08:38 AM
Fuck yeah got my beta key downloading fuck yeah!

Papero
10-02-2007, 09:54 AM
Wow my download froze over night at 88%, client deletes itself and need to redownload.

SlOtH
10-02-2007, 10:12 AM
Yeah I got the missing textures, but it seemed to get better.

My rig can't even play this on medium settings at 1280x1024. Even on low with 4x AA this game is beautiful. This game is going to make me buy an Ultra.

e6400 @ 3.2
7800GT @ stock
2gb of G.Skill

Macro
10-02-2007, 10:16 AM
Some screens from the beta (I didn't take them)

http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff287/gafpics/ScreenShot0016.jpg

http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff287/gafpics/Crysismp6.jpg

http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff287/gafpics/Crysismp5.jpg

http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff287/gafpics/Crysismp4.jpg

rand0m
10-02-2007, 12:02 PM
It put it as SUPER fail all because of my conroe being only 1.8ghz, everything else passed a couple bars then needed.

Fuck that website, I bet i'll get 30fps med settings.

Well Aside from the game been graphically demanding, it is also severly CPU intensive.

Gaming isn't just about Graphics cards now, you're going to need a decent CPU.

silverspade14
10-02-2007, 06:32 PM
Damn there are a lot of graphical glitches. Other than that it runs fine on high.

SlOtH
10-02-2007, 07:28 PM
It got better after a restart for me. Something in the distance is still bright green though. Drivers maybe? I'm running 163.67s.

It doesn't bother me though, I played for about 3 hours straight with no other problems. Pretty solid beta.

Papero
10-02-2007, 07:40 PM
Well, I'm running on medium settings with a 30+ fps and the game looks like crap.

Like a glorified Half life 2, I don't care about Crysis gameplay I simply wanted to experience the graphics. Not that it's anyones fault but mine, need a better graphics card, 7900gs just isn't cutting it. I just wish the engine scaled better, I was truly expecting better out of medium settings.

I remember watching a video where all these plants and tree were destructable, I tried that today and it's non-existent. They also showed when you walked through plants the leaves would bend to your position, they don't.

lordfarquad
10-02-2007, 07:43 PM
Just played the game for real today (not 5 minute play before school lol) and it was fucking awesome.
Mind you it NEEDS a lot of polish. The lag online is a little too much, and there is a lot of jerking and shit. Its like a better Insurgency HL2 mod, it just needs the polish and it'll be an even awesomer game and possibly GOTY.

Except insurgency sucked. What a waste of development.

rand0m
10-02-2007, 07:54 PM
Just played High on everything, omg ...

Oh MY FUCKING GOD

This game is fucking amazing, I'm getting lots of glitches and hicups however so far the game still impresses me ... fucking hell ...

diablo234
10-02-2007, 08:45 PM
why are people getting so much lag, the only lag i get is when joining a server, and the textures look yellow and black because they arent done loading after that i get 30+ fps and thats why my shitty pc

MexAmercn_Moose
10-02-2007, 08:48 PM
Well, I'm running on medium settings with a 30+ fps and the game looks like crap.

Like a glorified Half life 2, I don't care about Crysis gameplay I simply wanted to experience the graphics. Not that it's anyones fault but mine, need a better graphics card, 7900gs just isn't cutting it. I just wish the engine scaled better, I was truly expecting better out of medium settings.

I remember watching a video where all these plants and tree were destructable, I tried that today and it's non-existent. They also showed when you walked through plants the leaves would bend to your position, they don't.

really? i have a 7900 Go on my laptop and i am running the game on medium settings with the shadows on low and the game looks awesome...i was kicking ass too, a lot of noobs:cool:

Macro
10-03-2007, 04:23 AM
Just played High on everything, omg ...

Oh MY FUCKING GOD

This game is fucking amazing, I'm getting lots of glitches and hicups however so far the game still impresses me ... fucking hell ...

Screens, damnit!

rand0m
10-03-2007, 08:33 AM
Screens, damnit!

Not sure if your allowed to make screens of it ... but what the hell im about to go in and ill see if i can grab some.

YorkshireMan
10-03-2007, 12:30 PM
Well, I'm running on medium settings with a 30+ fps and the game looks like crap.

Like a glorified Half life 2, I don't care about Crysis gameplay I simply wanted to experience the graphics. Not that it's anyones fault but mine, need a better graphics card, 7900gs just isn't cutting it. I just wish the engine scaled better, I was truly expecting better out of medium settings.

I remember watching a video where all these plants and tree were destructable, I tried that today and it's non-existent. They also showed when you walked through plants the leaves would bend to your position, they don't.


man, so much for my 6600 GT running it, i wont even bother playing it untill I upgrade.

and any screenies wud be nice from anyone. :bigwink:

rand0m
10-03-2007, 12:37 PM
im going to download a program and put some up

xXSpawnXx
10-03-2007, 12:58 PM
Just played High on everything, omg ...

Oh MY FUCKING GOD

This game is fucking amazing, I'm getting lots of glitches and hicups however so far the game still impresses me ... fucking hell ...

I'm gonna guess that you just had a MOARgasm, and creamed your shorts. Can't blame you whatsoever.:bigwink:

rand0m
10-03-2007, 01:05 PM
Fuck can't seem to get my PC to screenshot this game ...


Anyhow, the Nanosuit is actually a really awsome idea, had a slight doubt about it however in the end it turns out it works out really well.

rashbeep
10-03-2007, 07:47 PM
just so you know, you can make the graphics and performance EVEN better (ie add some direct x 10 effects) by editing some cfg files..

diablo234
10-03-2007, 08:35 PM
man, so much for my 6600 GT running it, i wont even bother playing it untill I upgrade.

and any screenies wud be nice from anyone. :bigwink:

Fuck can't seem to get my PC to screenshot this game ...


Anyhow, the Nanosuit is actually a really awsome idea, had a slight doubt about it however in the end it turns out it works out really well.

here is a few screens i took with half medium and half high settings. i also made some 3D screens. they dont looks to good but I've heard even with a super PC its not prefect because its beta, meaning not fully polished.

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g1/diablo234/Crysis2007-10-0319-10-57-20.jpg

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g1/diablo234/Crysis2007-10-0319-05-44-23.jpg

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g1/diablo234/CRY3D2.png

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g1/diablo234/CRY3D.png

Zero-Man
10-03-2007, 11:38 PM
i love it, i dont liek the motion blur on high its a good idea but its not done to well the blur happens every step you take.. Also did they make the download subscribers only again?

Leesin
10-04-2007, 12:09 AM
Im not actually suffering much glitches, i get one every now and then and im running it pretty smoothly on high.

rand0m
10-04-2007, 12:57 PM
Ok if you want a funny glitch, go american, then when you spawn on the roof of the sub, cling to the ladder ... then buy your weapons.

Can't wait for the actual game though ...

silverspade14
10-04-2007, 03:41 PM
Which of these should I get:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115017

or

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115028

And would anyone want to purchase my e6400.

And does anyone know when the next generation of Nvidia cards is coming out?

diablo234
10-04-2007, 03:42 PM
^^ get AMD

SlOtH
10-04-2007, 03:52 PM
^^ get AMD

LOL

Get the Q6600.

lordfarquad
10-04-2007, 04:45 PM
No you dumbshit. He wants this for games, not applications!

Get the Core 2 Duo, nearly no games support the quadcore and do not use all of its power. The Core 2 Duo you posted is really good for games and applications.

edit: Someone explain why the E6700 is more expensive than the E6850
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115002&Tpk=e6700 (E6700)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115028 (E6850)

rand0m
10-04-2007, 04:56 PM
The E6600 Quad core overclocks real easy.

SlOtH
10-04-2007, 05:27 PM
Tons of games out now are already multi-threaded. Upcoming games like UT3, Alan Wake, and our beloved Crysis will fully utilize a Q6600.

IMO, getting the e6850 is a waste unless you are taking advantage of the unlocked multi. IE using water or phase to get huge OCs. You can easily pull off 3.0Ghz with the e6400 you have now.

If you aren't overclocking, the Quad makes way more sense because you would only be getting a 900mhz increase over getting an additional 2 more cores. That is if your playing recent games. Plus you can expect a pretty substantial OC with the Q6600 if you ever feel the need.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/core2quad-q6600.html

Dr Jones
10-04-2007, 05:49 PM
The E6600 Quad core overclocks real easy.

ALL of the intel core/quad duo's overclock real easy.


there is no reason to overclock the Q6600. there are no games on the market that even use the Q6600 to it's full capacity. not even crysis will use the Q6600 to it's full capacity. in fact, the UT3 recommended processor spec is 2.4 dual core. so you can imagine how Q6600 would already be overkill and would reap no benefits by being overclocked. no sense in risking damage to your processor when you get no benefits from it.

SlOtH
10-04-2007, 07:32 PM
Hahaha, believe what you want. The quads will take over in Q4. Games are just going to start utilizing quads more and more. Why take a step backwards.

Also with thermal throttling and some basic common sense, it's next to impossible to damage todays processors with overclocking. Most of the 3.2GHz overclocks you see on the Q6600s are done with a very small increase in Vcore.

There is NO SUCH THING as overkill in a gaming PC.:rollseyes A gaming PC is all about having the best and smoothest experience possible.

Dr Jones
10-04-2007, 07:42 PM
Why take a step backwards.



this is not about taking a step backwards, this is about NOT risking damaging your processor when you will reap NO benefits and see no enhancements from doing so.


buy a Q6600 if you want, but do not overclock it. it will do nothing. no sense in risking damage when it won't enhance anything. no game on the market fully utilizes the Q6600 right now, not even crysis or UT3. they recommend 2.4 ghz dual core for those games.



the only way you will notice benefits from a Q6600 is if you do alot of video editing, or if you run multiple applications simultaneously, as in photoshop and after effects.

SlOtH
10-04-2007, 07:56 PM
Running at stock, go with the e6850.

Overclocking, go with the Q6600. You'll feel a difference.

Hows that sound?

lordfarquad
10-04-2007, 08:44 PM
Coming from the dude with a Core2 Duo avatar, I'd go with the E6850.
But whys the E6700 more expensive than the quad core Q6600?

SlOtH
10-04-2007, 09:36 PM
Coming from the dude with a Core2 Duo avatar, I'd go with the E6850.
But whys the E6700 more expensive than the quad core Q6600?

Thats just on newegg. I might be wrong, but I believe they base their prices on their how much they have in stock and general demand. Prices on newegg are always fluctuating.

Owned
10-04-2007, 09:51 PM
Which of these should I get:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115017

or

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115028

And would anyone want to purchase my e6400.

And does anyone know when the next generation of Nvidia cards is coming out?

Neither. Grab yourself an AMD X2 Athlon 6000+ stock @ 3.0GHz.

rashbeep
10-05-2007, 10:01 PM
http://img105.imageshack.us/img105/1255/crysis2wv8.jpg

lordfarquad
10-06-2007, 08:04 PM
this game is starting to suck. the cars are too explosive, the players are getting too good, the controls arent fast responding enough, and the nano suit powers are too little.

xXSpawnXx
10-06-2007, 08:18 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAN-SWsWvaI&mode=related&search=