PDA

View Full Version : Divorce - HALF!


Bullet
03-17-2008, 11:19 PM
LONDON, England (CNN) -- Heather Mills, the estranged wife of Paul McCartney, was granted nearly £25 million ($50 million) in her divorce proceedings with the former Beatle, she said Monday.
art.mccartney.gi.jpg

Mills and McCartney, pictured before divorce proceedings, married in 2002 and have a young daughter.

Mills said she will not appeal the award, but she will appeal the publication of the hearing transcript, which she said McCartney has asked for.

In an 11-minute statement to reporters outside the High Court after the verdict, Mills said she was pleased that the bitter divorce hearings had ended.

"I'm so glad it's over and it was an incredible result, in the end, to secure my and my daughter's future, and that of all the charities that I obviously plan on helping," said Mills, dressed in a khaki, green and blue suit with a bright red shirt.

Mills has established a career as a campaigner and charity worker since losing a leg in a road accident in 1993. Video Watch Mills react to the decision »

Judge Hugh Bennett awarded Mills, who represented herself, £24.3 million ($48.6 million), according to the court's release.

She had sought an award of nearly £125 million ($251 million), the court said. McCartney had proposed £15.8 million ($31.6 million), it said. Read the court's statement

The judgment included £35,000 ($70,000) a year for the couple's 4-year-old daughter, Beatrice. Mills said she was unhappy with that amount because it isn't enough for school tuition, private security, or first-class airfare.
McCartney-Mills divorce
Is it possible both sides could wind up back in court to air their dirty laundry? The big surprises on "Showbiz Tonight."
Tonight, 11p ET & PT on Headline News
see full schedule »

"He likes her to fly five times a year on holiday," Mills said of McCartney. "It's £17,000 for two people return (round-trip) first class, so that's obviously not meant to happen for her anymore. It's very sad."

According to the court's release, the award includes £600,000 ($1.2 million) a year for Mills and £2.5 million ($5 million) for her to purchase property in London.

Mills said she would appeal to stop the publication of the entire judgment because it contains private details about Beatrice and she doesn't want them released. The judge has granted permission for the litigants to speak publicly, she said.

McCartney did not speak to reporters after the verdict.

Mills said that as a "litigant in person," or a litigant representing herself, the system worked against her at every turn.

"These people are in a club," she said. "It's like they want to stay together and they don't want to see a litigant in person doing well."

She said the judge did not agree with her on important details, including how long the couple lived together or even McCartney's personal wealth, which she estimated at £800 million ($1.6 billion). She said the judge estimated it to be half of that.
Don't Miss

* Family Court statement on Mills-McCartney judgment
* People.com: Mills 'so happy' with settlement

"I won't go into all the horrific details of what happened because I'm just glad it's over," Mills said. "I really hope now that me and my daughter can have a life and not be followed every single day, and that is why I've come out -- to give it closure."

McCartney and Mills failed to agree on a settlement ending their four-year marriage in divorce hearings last month, leaving the judge to decide the terms.

McCartney and Mills married in 2002 after meeting at a charity event.

At the time of their split in 2006, they described it as amicable, despite widespread reports of a tempestuous relationship between McCartney and the former model.

Mills has since lashed out at news media coverage of the divorce, which she said has been unfair to her and driven her to the brink of suicide.
advertisement

In a television interview last year, Mills said she had endured "18 months of abuse, worse than a murderer or pedophile."

Monday's divorce settlement fell short of the previous record for a litigated divorce settlement in Britain. An award of £48 million ($96 million) was handed down last year, according to British divorce lawyer Julian Lipson.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/03/17/mccartney.mills/index.html

It's probably not half, but still, that's a shit load of money. I'm scared of getting married. Hold me.

Your views on divorce and whatnot?

Dayve
03-17-2008, 11:24 PM
Oh god, little Beatrice won't be able to fly round-trip flights 5 times a year at £17,000 a pop anymore because her daddy is only giving her 70 grand a year to live on... Her life must be so awful. :wah:

elvis
03-18-2008, 12:21 AM
that bitch pisses me off. fucking cock sucking leech. she's the cause of all the worlds problems, her and the 50 mill she made for doing absolutely nothing. prenubs are the best things ever invented.

Jordan
03-18-2008, 12:25 AM
Half?

McCartney is worth a reported 1.6billion dollars..

I find this settlement MORE than enough for that greedy ass gold-digging whore.

Bergs
03-18-2008, 12:25 AM
Guess who's getting a pre-nup the next time he gets married? Paul McCartney thats who!

Seriously though, I don't know how the UK works, but in the United States part of the equitable division of assets is based on maintaining the non-bread winning spouses standard of living at the same level as when the marriage was active. Thats ridiculous. You don't have a right to an extravagant lifestyle. If you did not directly contribute to your spouse's income, you should not be entitled to half or enough to maintain your lifestyle out of principle. Its nonsense.

Liberator13
03-18-2008, 12:49 AM
It is absolute nonsense. She didn't do a goddamn thing to deserve that money.

Mojoe77
03-18-2008, 12:56 AM
Further proof that women use that atomic bomb in between their legs to get what they want. Then again, McCartney is stupid for not signing a prenup. She didn't do anything to deserve that money, everyone in the UK hates her and with good reason.

_jax
03-18-2008, 02:32 AM
yep mccartney should've kept his pimp hand strong. now he pays the price. in other news, 50's baby's mama who was previously granted 25k a month in child support wasn't happy with her pay, so she took it to court to try to squeeze out 50k a month from mr cent. fortunately for the rap star the judge decided instead to "go upside her head" and send her home with the reduced amount of $6,700 a month. props to 50 for knocking her up and props to the judge for keepin' it real.

TFS
03-18-2008, 03:32 AM
Honestly, I don't think what a spouse receives should even consider what the two made before their marriage. Each spouse should only receive assets accurately reflecting the percentage of the income they had during the marriage.

And in regard to Mills: who the fuck does she think she is taking 50 million from this man to secure "her and her daughter's future?"

It's his daughter too, dumbass, her future is more than secure if she's a descendant of a Beatle. She'll have full access to her dad's assets no matter what, you fucking whore. All you had to worry about was your own lazy, unemployed, one-legged ass, and 50 million is excessive. If you can't take 5 million and invest it wisely, that's your own damn fault, and your own damn problem.

And charities? Fuck you! You think the vegan you just split from is suddenly going to stop protesting seal clubbing? The guy was on the fucking ice, himself, with the fucking seals. I doubt charities are going to suffer a great loss at his hands anytime soon you pretentious bitch.

I hope to God we see her sporting a new, diamond-crusted artificial leg, and she tries to pass that off as her spending the money to secure her (and HIS) daughter's future and then see her wonder why everyone suddenly despises her even more than they do now for having crossed a Beatle.

There are some things you just don't do: you don't try to take a cop's gun out of his holster when he isn't looking, and you don't cross a Beatle.

j.elohim
03-18-2008, 05:24 AM
"Beatrice only gets £35,000 a year - so obviously she's meant to travel B class while her father travels A class, but obviously I will pay for that."

The woman makes my blood boil. It sounds like McCartney's accountant might have done a good job hiding assets because Mills had been saying he was worth 800 million but the judge decided to award her money on the basis he was worth 400. Sir Paul did come out with one of the classiest responses ever after the judgement was made of saying to the press "all will be revealed", of course saying his loud mouth ex-bint will be out soon to blabber about it to the press whom last year she said were awfully horrible to her but now, apparently, wants to know everything about her life again.

Jenovah
03-18-2008, 06:19 AM
IMO people divorce too easily over too little nowadays, can't they just think of the little daughter who now has to deal with divorced FAMOUS parents, can't they see how stressful that must be for her? (Note: I don't know the exact age of the daughter, so feel free to correct me on this.)

I agree fully with TFS, that bitch will probably just spend that money on herself instead of the "future of her daughter".

_Joe
03-18-2008, 08:04 AM
Oh god, little Beatrice won't be able to fly round-trip flights 5 times a year at £17,000 a pop anymore because her daddy is only giving her 70 grand a year to live on... Her life must be so awful. :wah:

Yea, I had to check the source to see if this was real right after reading that. How do you get that warped that you are willing to pay over $30,000 on one plane trip, five times a year???

Bullet
03-18-2008, 06:08 PM
I agree with you guys. If a couple are willing to get married, they should be aware of the financial troubles ahead. If they get divorced, the woman shouldn't be awarded simply because she's a woman. Uh.. equality my ass, women. If a couple gets divorced, they can easily divide the money or some shit. The most money I would have given the woman is probably a million bucks. At most. Get a fucking job you stupid twat.

_jax
03-18-2008, 06:38 PM
i don't really see why you're all mad at the bitch for, she's just trying to get paid, hell if you were in her place you'd probably try to milk the old bastard for all his cream too. it's 100% paul mccartney's fault for getting played like a sucker.

TFS
03-18-2008, 06:53 PM
i don't really see why you're all mad at the bitch for, she's just trying to get paid, hell if you were in her place you'd probably try to milk the old bastard for all his cream too. it's 100% paul mccartney's fault for getting played like a sucker.

Bullshit it is. It's inexcusable to play someone's emotions like she has with him. If she was any kind of decent human being or had any real sense of love, she wouldn't be doing this to him.

If she wants to get paid, she can get a real job, and some goddamn perspective that prevents her from ignorantly saying that flying coach is unacceptable like she views what the average person is able to do as sub-human compared to only what a handful of people in this world are able to afford and stupidly squander money on. She has that attitude of entitlement, and you know she's going to instill it in their daughter too. I'd wager a good amount of money that the daughter is going to grow up like Paris Hilton the way her mother talks about raising her.

I'd smack the hell out of my parents if they ever purchased a $35,000 plane ticket, even if that had the money to burn on it. That's just obscene.

_jax
03-18-2008, 07:10 PM
it's not like this is some uncommon phenomenon. anyone who has any assets to protect knows the risks of getting married without a pre nup, or getting a chick pregnant. i dont know what fairy tale you guys live in but in the real world marriage is always a gamble. always. mccartney slipped up, he didn't use his best judgement and now he's losing money. i can't feel bad for him. of course i'd always root for the courts to go in the dude's favor but if not... oh well, you fucked up. maybe next time he'll play his cards right.

as for the bitch, being a gold digger is a legitimate career. as long as there's suckers like mccartney out there females will continue to scheme. welcome to planet earth.

TFS
03-18-2008, 07:16 PM
it's not like this is some uncommon phenomenon. anyone who has any assets to protect knows the risks of getting married without a pre nup, or getting a chick pregnant. i dont know what fairy tale you guys live in but in the real world marriage is always a gamble. always. mccartney slipped up, he didn't use his best judgement and now he's losing money. i can't feel bad for him. of course i'd always root for the courts to go in the dude's favor but if not... oh well, you fucked up. maybe next time he'll play his cards right.

as for the bitch, being a gold digger is a legitimate career. as long as there's suckers like mccartney out there females will continue to scheme. welcome to planet earth.

So you're all right with this form of con art? Using Fraudulent claims to make money without intending to give anything in return is a crime, you know.

_jax
03-18-2008, 07:22 PM
not that it's "ok," necessarily, since basically anyone who's a gold digger has to live with being a trick ass hoe. but if they can live with that, and they can, then it's just up to you to not get played.

she gave him pussy, a daughter, and a few years of marriage. it's just a less honest form of prostitution.

Bullet
03-18-2008, 07:42 PM
i don't really see why you're all mad at the bitch for, she's just trying to get paid, hell if you were in her place you'd probably try to milk the old bastard for all his cream too. it's 100% paul mccartney's fault for getting played like a sucker.

It's a matter of principle, sherlock. She just wants to milk McCartney out of all his money just so she can get all the money possible. That's a sad fucking life. It's snobbish and pretty much suggests she is a devil. She has no empathy for McCartney. She fucking thinks she's right. She's using her role in society to get what she wants. Aka, a twat/bitch.

Why do you defend her? She doesn't deserve jack shit. She gave McCartney pussy and a daughter? Please, anyone could do that. Pussy/love shouldn't cost a cent. The court system is fucked up the ass sideways.

_jax
03-18-2008, 08:25 PM
you're right, it shouldn't, but who's responsibility is it to make sure that it doesnt? i'm not defending her, i call it like i see it. she's clearly a gold digging hoe. it happens. it's still mccartney's fault he got played. she won he lost. case closed.

modogthemonkey
03-19-2008, 12:24 AM
The court papers/judges summary have been made public today. And they make look like dick/gold digging hoe.

http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1309655,00.html

25 mil for 4 years work is not too bad....I don't think Sir Paul is short of cash though.

Mouland
03-19-2008, 05:08 PM
Although she is a dumb, gold digging bitch, this is also Paul's fault. He was warned by his friends and financial advisers to sign a prenup, but he was all, "blah blah blah, I love her," and said he didn't believe in it. He did fuck up. I think he actually got off pretty cheap given how much he is actually worth, it is not like having 1.5 billion minus less than 100 million will really make your life any different.

Mr.SelfDestruct
03-20-2008, 01:28 PM
I agree with you guys. If a couple are willing to get married, they should be aware of the financial troubles ahead. If they get divorced, the woman shouldn't be awarded simply because she's a woman. Uh.. equality my ass, women. If a couple gets divorced, they can easily divide the money or some shit. The most money I would have given the woman is probably a million bucks. At most. Get a fucking job you stupid twat.

She wasn't awarded that much because she was a woman. It's because she didn't make anything.

If the roles were reversed, the husband could also walk away with several million.

particlephysics
03-20-2008, 04:45 PM
one word for her "GOLD DIGGER"