View Full Version : Better Voice: Lennon Vs. McCartney
YouEnjoyMyself
02-27-2005, 05:53 PM
So who's got the better voice?
Vote and discuss here.
_/`\o_
02-27-2005, 06:02 PM
I personally like McCartney better. He has more of an energetic voice that I like. But none the less John Lennon is still a great singer.
Tis I, oopyman
02-27-2005, 06:07 PM
Who the fuck are John Lennon and Paul McCartney? More like John GAY and Paul GAY! amirite?
Nacho
02-27-2005, 06:10 PM
^^^ no you are wrong......
I picked Lennon cause his vocals and lyrics i think are more relaxing.....it all depends on your taste in music
piggyman18
02-27-2005, 06:14 PM
Who the fuck are John Lennon and Paul McCartney? More like John GAY and Paul GAY! amirite?
In the month and a half that I've been here, I've never seen a post as retarded as that. You deserve to be shot.
Tis I, oopyman
02-27-2005, 06:16 PM
In the month and a half that I've been here, I've never seen a post as retarded as that. You deserve to be shot.
In the nearly two years I've been around this place, I've seen many many worse.
Nacho
02-27-2005, 06:19 PM
In the nearly two years I've been around this place, I've seen many many worse.
Wow two years thats alot......why does it say joined Feb 2005?
EDIT: **SARCASM**
YouEnjoyMyself
02-27-2005, 06:24 PM
Wow two years thats alot......why does it say joined Feb 2005?
Because he's a faggot.
Back on topic!
Tis I, oopyman
02-27-2005, 06:24 PM
Wow two years thats alot......why does it say joined Feb 2005?
If you had any logical thoughts in your fucking mind you could've guessed that somehow, someone made another account.
Tis I, oopyman
02-27-2005, 06:25 PM
Because he's a faggot.
Back on topic!
I love you too sweety pie.
Why aren't you on AIM?
YouEnjoyMyself
02-27-2005, 06:34 PM
I love you too sweety pie.
Why aren't you on AIM?
I don't feel like talking to anybody. No offense, now I'm about to go take a bath.
And when I come back, this thread better be hoppin'.
Tis I, oopyman
02-27-2005, 06:35 PM
I don't feel like talking to anybody. No offense, now I'm about to go take a bath.
And when I come back, this thread better be hoppin'.
WTF!? Hippies don't bathe. This isn't right!
moosenuts
02-27-2005, 08:42 PM
Band on the Run = Auditory Orgasm. Think about it.
Sabliminel
02-27-2005, 09:19 PM
I think they both have a great voice. I mean come on every Beatle was awesome.
tophizzle
02-27-2005, 10:02 PM
My personal prefrence is McCartney
reigenborn
02-27-2005, 10:06 PM
McCartney is technically a better singer
But I prefer Lennon.
lameassdude
02-28-2005, 01:26 AM
Paul had the voice, but when it came to writing, Paul had nothing on John.
Some has said this too me couple days ago, and I think I agree with it.
Paul writes catchy, mainstream music. while Lennon writes original music. Notice the difference. They are both good musicians, both wanted piece on earth, both loved music, both are legends. But I think Lennon has a great voice.
callmejulio
02-28-2005, 10:22 AM
I had a hard time coming to this decision. If you really want a good comparison of the two's voices than you should listen to "A Day in the Life." My favorite verse of that song is Paul's becausse it just has more energy, which I like.
Best singer = Paul
Best Musician = John
Coolest = Ringo
BiGsExy1986
02-28-2005, 11:30 AM
Paul's the better singer, John's the better writer. Perfect combo if you ask me. George was also a great singer/songwriter that is always overlooked when people talk about the Beatles.
gigatonblast
02-28-2005, 11:54 AM
Paul is 9 + in the vocal department...
Johns almost an 8.
I wonder what we would be saying today about John Lennon had he not been murdered...
TurbulenceXM
02-28-2005, 01:56 PM
Paul is the Singer and John is the Writer. Either way both are amazing.
Luger-Matic
02-28-2005, 06:04 PM
Paul is 9 + in the vocal department...
Johns almost an 8.
I wonder what we would be saying today about John Lennon had he not been murdered...
It's a good question actually, but back on topic...
I can't really decide. If you listen to some of the songs though, the harmony between John, Paul, and George is incredible! :bang:
mrdominoe2000
03-01-2005, 05:14 PM
well lennon is very very relaxing, but mcartney had a more rock and roll style thing goin for him, but they both were the shit
i said mcartney because his stuff after the beatles were done was better than lennon's
Kenyan
03-01-2005, 07:42 PM
i would say Mccartney. I say this because i have heard more songs by McCartney. But i love them both :bang:
*edit* o yea, and just in case u guys said i must havent heard many beatles songs. i have "number one(s)" the white album, abbey road, sgt pepper.
Liberation
03-02-2005, 04:07 PM
Come on guys what about Ringo Star? Yellow submarine! :)
I also Like Both of them Equally, there voices each have thier own style about them. Thier voices suit different songs. However my honest opinion is that McCartney has a better voice, only by a bit tho! Lennon Is the better song Writer. One of my favurite beatles songs is "In my life" I don't know who wrote that tho, I imagine Lennon did tho.
Also How can you not know who these to people are! :banghead:
marshalldylan10
03-03-2005, 05:01 PM
Paul is a better singer.
John was a better song writer.
And Ringo had a big nose.
ooooh, and George was good on guitar too.
k_tull88
03-03-2005, 10:42 PM
I've always liked Paul's vocals the best, John's were great, but Paul's more energetic.
ZinZey
03-04-2005, 12:11 AM
Although both are legends, I personally liked Lennon better.
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.